From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262484AbTI0QLS (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:11:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262491AbTI0QLS (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:11:18 -0400 Received: from fed1mtao02.cox.net ([68.6.19.243]:40630 "EHLO fed1mtao02.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262484AbTI0QLR (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:11:17 -0400 Message-ID: <3F75B6A5.4070505@backtobasicsmgmt.com> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 09:11:17 -0700 From: "Kevin P. Fleming" Organization: Back to Basics Network Management User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michal Kochanowicz CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What to use with 2.6.x instead of iproute2? References: <20030927151935.GD5956@wieszak.lan> In-Reply-To: <20030927151935.GD5956@wieszak.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michal Kochanowicz wrote: > Hi! > > It seems that iproute2 is not maintained any more and it doesn't build > with kernel 2.6.0-test5. > > What tool one should use to set the interfaces, bridges and such up on > 2.6.x kernels? > > Regards Using the patches from RedHat's iproute2 SRPM I can build iproute2 against 2.6.0-test5 headers with no problems, and it works. With TC support, even.