From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262126AbTI0SMZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2003 14:12:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262131AbTI0SMZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2003 14:12:25 -0400 Received: from natsmtp00.webmailer.de ([192.67.198.102]:53232 "EHLO natsmtp00.webmailer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262126AbTI0SMX (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2003 14:12:23 -0400 Message-ID: <3F75D35C.9040609@softhome.net> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 20:13:48 +0200 From: "Ihar 'Philips' Filipau" Organization: Home Sweet Home User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030831 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roger Luethi CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: [OT] No Swap. Re: [BUG 2.6.90-test5] kernel shits itself with 48mb ram under moderate load References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Roger Luethi wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 01:26:34 +1000, Jason Lewis wrote: >> 0 12 0 3424 816 6008 0 0 19712 0 5519 3184 0 12 0 87 > > ^^^^ > Looks like you don't have swap enabled. Are successful 2.4 runs with or > without swap? > I'm running RH stock 2.4.20-20.9 without swap for around month. OOo, Mozilla, eDonkey & heaps of xterms. Even evaluation of VMware with Win2K inside was Ok. On average: much better experience. $ free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 513872 507128 6744 0 32784 341404 -/+ buffers/cache: 132940 380932 Swap: 0 0 0 $ vmstat procs memory swap io system cpu r b w swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id 0 0 0 0 6744 32708 341292 0 2 6 24 17 39 3 1 16 -- Ihar 'Philips' Filipau / with best regards from Saarbruecken. -- "... and for $64000 question, could you get yourself vaguely familiar with the notion of on-topic posting?" -- Al Viro @ LKML