From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
To: "Murray J. Root" <murrayr@brain.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test6 scheduling(?) oddness
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 14:08:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F7A534B.3020401@cyberone.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031001032238.GB1416@Master>
Murray J. Root wrote:
>P4 2G
>1G PC2700 RAM
>ASUS P4S533
>
>Large tasks (like raytrace rendering) take double the amount of time they used
>to take, although the system is nicer to the user while they run. In
>2.6.0-test5 had a little trouble with it and Piggin pointed me to a patch that
>fixed it and is now in -test6, however the patch didn't slow the rendering as
>much as it does in test6. (Con Koliva's patch, I believe it was).
>For example - rendering an image that took 15 minutes in 2.5.65 takes 20
>minutes in 2.6.0-test5 (with patch) and 30 minutes in 2.6.0-test6 (raw from
>kernel.org). Same config options (everything I use builtin - no modules).
>
>A new issue (which also doesn't happen in -test5 with the patch):
>When running cpu intense tasks, new (large) tasks will not start till the first
>one finishes.
>For example, using POV-Ray 3.5 to render an image that takes 30 minutes when it
>is the only program running, start oowriter.
>The render finishes in the same 30 minutes, then oowriter starts.
>oowriter takes about 3 seconds to load if no rendering is going on.
>I can use apps that are already open but can't start new ones while rendering.
>In 2.6.0-test5 (with patch) opening oowriter while rendering takes about 1
>minute.
>In 2.5.65 opening oowriter while rendering takes about 2 minutes (and X gets
>very hard to use till oowriter is completely done opening).
>
Hi Murray!
Con Kolivas' patch has been included in test6. You might have tried that
or maybe my patch?
Anyway, lets just clarify your report:
1 CPU, hyperthreading on or off?
test5 interactivity under load isn't as good as test6.
povray takes 150% more time in test6 vs tset5. How many compute threads
does povray use? Is anything else running?
oowriter takes 3 seconds to load when nothing is running
oowriter takes 30(or more) minutes to load when povray is runnnig, takes
1 minute in test5 plus patch (could you tell us exactly what the patch
is)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-01 4:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-01 3:22 2.6.0-test6 scheduling(?) oddness Murray J. Root
2003-10-01 4:08 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2003-10-01 4:09 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-01 4:35 ` Murray J. Root
2003-10-01 4:55 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-01 5:04 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-01 5:18 ` Murray J. Root
2003-10-01 6:53 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-01 7:19 ` Murray J. Root
2003-10-01 5:10 ` Murray J. Root
2003-10-01 21:47 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-01 22:30 ` Ed Sweetman
2003-10-06 2:29 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-06 17:02 ` Murray J. Root
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F7A534B.3020401@cyberone.com.au \
--to=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=murrayr@brain.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).