From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263821AbTJ1BsV (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 20:48:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263824AbTJ1BsV (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 20:48:21 -0500 Received: from mail-06.iinet.net.au ([203.59.3.38]:43741 "HELO mail.iinet.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263821AbTJ1BsU (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 20:48:20 -0500 Message-ID: <3F9DCAE0.1010109@cyberone.com.au> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:48:16 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030827 Debian/1.4-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nigel Cunningham CC: cliff white , Michael Frank , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test8/test9 io scheduler needs tuning? References: <200310261201.14719.mhf@linuxmail.org> <20031027145531.2eb01017.cliffw@osdl.org> <3F9DAF2C.8010308@cyberone.com.au> <1067305071.1693.14.camel@laptop-linux> In-Reply-To: <1067305071.1693.14.camel@laptop-linux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nigel Cunningham wrote: >I'll try it with my software suspend patch. Under 2.4, I get around 45 >pages per jiffy written when suspending. Under 2.6, I'm currently >getting 2-4, so any improvement should be obvious! > It might speed it up a bit for you. Although maybe you are measuring with 100 vs 1000 jiffies/s?