From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261656AbTKBLuV (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2003 06:50:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261659AbTKBLuV (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2003 06:50:21 -0500 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:43425 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261656AbTKBLuT (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2003 06:50:19 -0500 Message-ID: <3FA4EF79.5060708@namesys.com> Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 14:50:17 +0300 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Herbert Xu CC: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0test9 Reiserfs boot time "buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:431" References: <20031029141931.6c4ebdb5.akpm@osdl.org> <20031101233354.1f566c80.akpm@osdl.org> <20031102092723.GA4964@gondor.apana.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20031102092723.GA4964@gondor.apana.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Herbert Xu wrote: >On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 11:33:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > >>aargh. I thought Debian's 2.6 kernels were unmodified. Are they carrying >>any other changes? >> >> > >Yes we are. You can find the changes in > >http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.0-test9/ > > > > Why are you guys modifying the official kernel? Are you seeking advantage over the other distros or? This was one of the nice things about debian, that it didn't have unofficial destabilizing stuff in the kernel like the other distros. -- Hans