From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262324AbTKNJsV (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2003 04:48:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262327AbTKNJsV (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2003 04:48:21 -0500 Received: from adsl-67-114-19-185.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net ([67.114.19.185]:18314 "EHLO bastard") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262324AbTKNJsT (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2003 04:48:19 -0500 Message-ID: <3FB4A4DC.60004@tupshin.com> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 01:48:12 -0800 From: Tupshin Harper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030901 Thunderbird/0.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan-Benedict Glaw Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air References: <3FB3CB96.9080507@tupshin.com> <20031114071409.GF17497@lug-owl.de> In-Reply-To: <20031114071409.GF17497@lug-owl.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: >On Thu, 2003-11-13 10:21:10 -0800, Tupshin Harper >wrote in message <3FB3CB96.9080507@tupshin.com>: > > >>Davide Libenzi wrote: >> >> >>>Larry, if there are really six users (i'm one of them, rsync) among >>>pserver and rsync access, I am the first to tell you shut it down. It is >>>not worth. On the other hand IIRC it was you that, when Pavel showed up >>>with the bitbucket hack to extract metadata from BK, volunteered to do it >>>internally inside BM. Do I remember correctly? >>> >>> >>As one of the six, I would happily 2nd the shutting down of the >>pserver...rsync is fine with me. I would actually prefer no CVS archive >>at all as long as the raw changesets were rsyncable...then the community >>would be responsible for doing something useful with them instead of BM. >> >> > >That would be fine with me, too, but there's one little drawback: The >changeset format. You can't simply use a patch(1) file because there is >a (really little) number of non-text files in the kernel source tree >that won't diff... > >MfG, JBG > > > An acceptable hurdle to overcome. -Tupshin