From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261299AbTLANnd (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:43:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261735AbTLANnc (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:43:32 -0500 Received: from smtp11.eresmas.com ([62.81.235.111]:47785 "EHLO smtp11.eresmas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261299AbTLANnc (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:43:32 -0500 Message-ID: <3FCB4506.8080305@wanadoo.es> Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:41:26 +0100 From: Xose Vazquez Perez User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: gl, es, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel Subject: Re: libata in 2.4.24? X-Enigmail-Version: 0.63.3.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: >> >> I'm happy to include it in 2.4 when Jeff thinks its stable enough for a >> stable series. ;) > I thought a bit more about this issue and I have a different opinion now. > > 2.6 is getting more and more stable and already includes libata --- users > who need it should use 2.6. Does it mean that 2.4.x is going to freeze, and only critical and security patches are going to be applied ?