From: Erik Steffl <steffl@bigfoot.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: libata in 2.4.24?
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:00:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FCBB9F1.2080300@bigfoot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FCBB15F.7050505@rackable.com>
Samuel Flory wrote:
> Greg Stark wrote:
>
>> Samuel Flory <sflory@rackable.com> writes:
>>
>>
>>> It's getting harder to find a newly released motherboard without
>>> onboard
>>> sata. Not having libata support means that anyone running 2.4
>>> unpatched will
>>> be unable to use such systems.
>>
>>
>>
>> My motherboard has a SATA controller and I'm using it in non-legacy
>> mode with
>> 2.4.23. What is this libata thing I'm supposed to be needing?
>>
>
> What chipset are you using? Assumming that hda is your sata drive.
> What are the results of the following "hdarm -t /dev/hda" "hdparm -dvi
> /dev/hda" The ICH5 chipset is the only chipset I've found that works
> well without libata.
not for drives >133GB (I have intel D865PERL mb and 250GB matrox, it
doesn't work without SCSI_ATA (at all), it cannot read/write above 133GB
without libata patches)
erik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-01 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-28 18:27 linux-2.4.23 released Marcelo Tosatti
2003-11-28 19:06 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-11-28 22:55 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-11-29 22:26 ` libata in 2.4.24? Samuel Flory
2003-11-29 23:10 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-01 10:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-01 18:06 ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-01 21:12 ` Greg Stark
2003-12-01 21:23 ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-01 21:44 ` Greg Stark
2003-12-01 22:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-01 22:06 ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-01 22:00 ` Erik Steffl [this message]
2003-12-02 5:36 ` Greg Stark
[not found] ` <20031202055336.GO1566@mis-mike-wstn.matchmail.com>
2003-12-02 5:58 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-02 16:31 ` Greg Stark
2003-12-02 17:40 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-02 18:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-02 18:46 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-02 18:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-04 8:18 ` Jens Axboe
2003-12-02 18:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-02 18:51 ` Greg Stark
2003-12-02 19:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-02 20:10 ` Greg Stark
2003-12-02 20:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-02 20:34 ` Greg Stark
2003-12-02 22:34 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-02 23:02 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-02 23:18 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-02 23:40 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-03 0:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-03 0:47 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-12-07 5:33 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-12-01 21:36 ` Justin Cormack
2003-12-01 13:41 Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-12-01 14:11 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-02 19:59 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-12-02 22:05 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-02 22:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-03 0:34 Xose Vazquez Perez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FCBB9F1.2080300@bigfoot.com \
--to=steffl@bigfoot.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).