From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262546AbTLBRdr (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:33:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262558AbTLBRdr (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:33:47 -0500 Received: from natsmtp00.rzone.de ([81.169.145.165]:19893 "EHLO natsmtp00.webmailer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262546AbTLBRdp (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:33:45 -0500 Message-ID: <3FCCCCF6.4030302@softhome.net> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 18:33:42 +0100 From: "Ihar 'Philips' Filipau" Organization: Home Sweet Home User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030927 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Takashi Iwai CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: USB Audio, Alsa & HK SoundSticks References: <3FCC6921.9000909@softhome.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! Takashi Iwai wrote: > > try ALSA 1.0.0rc1. > if the usb driver is NOT usb-uhci, try async_unlink=1 option for > snd-usb-audio. because usb-uhci has a bug in the async unlinking, the > async-unlink mode is disabled as default for 2.4 kernels. > Half of an hour - works without problems. Thanks. [ I am using exactly usb-uhci. "Works For Me" (tm) without any parameters. ] [ I have spend more time to f*ck up RHL9 to load automatically alsa. And bit more time to figure-out that RHL start-up scripts do screw things up completely. gamix, alsamixer do work, but xmms fails to open alsa's dsp. "rmmod snd*; modprobe sound-slot-0" in late start-up helped. Need to upgrade my RHL9 to Debian... Too old for this /desktop/ non-sense. But still I am (as a device driver developer) trying to understand how it is possible to screw something in module loading process so mixer is here but dsp is not, while they are represented by the very same module. ] -- Ihar 'Philips' Filipau / with best regards from Saarbruecken. -- _ _ _ Because the kernel depends on it existing. "init" |_|*|_| literally _is_ special from a kernel standpoint, |_|_|*| because its' the "reaper of zombies" (and, may I add, |*|*|*| that would be a great name for a rock band). -- Linus Torvalds