From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262094AbTLCW7N (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:59:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262108AbTLCW7N (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:59:13 -0500 Received: from smtp13.eresmas.com ([62.81.235.113]:19427 "EHLO smtp13.eresmas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262094AbTLCW7L (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:59:11 -0500 Message-ID: <3FCE6A8F.506@wanadoo.es> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:58:23 +0100 From: Xose Vazquez Perez User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: gl, es, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel Subject: Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause? X-Enigmail-Version: 0.63.3.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: > there is no such exception, for example see: > > http://www.kernelnewbies.org/kernels/rh9/SOURCES/COPYING.module and 'Proprietary kernel modules' in: http://people.redhat.com/rkeech/pkm.html moral: closed source modules sucks.