From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263740AbTLDXgY (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:36:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263742AbTLDXgX (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:36:23 -0500 Received: from imap.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:24471 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263740AbTLDXgW (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:36:22 -0500 X-Authenticated: #4512188 Message-ID: <3FCFC4F3.8030407@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 00:36:19 +0100 From: "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031116 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Craig Bradney CC: "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" , Jesse Allen , cheuche+lkml@free.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11) - IRQ flood related ? References: <3FCF25F2.6060008@netzentry.com> <1070551149.4063.8.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> <20031204163243.GA10471@forming> <20031204175548.GB10471@forming> <20031204200208.GA4167@localnet> <20031204230528.GA189@tesore.local> <3FCFBFC3.5070403@gmx.de> <1070580108.4100.8.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> In-Reply-To: <1070580108.4100.8.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Craig Bradney wrote: > Prakash, > > try it without preempt.. just to see. As soon as I removed it today the > crashes went away (for 5 hours).. PC is now up for 2.5 hours and I'm > waiting to see if it will be 5 hrs or 5 days this time around :) Oh Ok, I did a mistake: Checking my kernel config again I noticed my last experiment indeed was with preemp OFF, so it didn't help. Prakash > On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 00:14, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: > >>Jesse Allen wrote: >> >>>On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:02:08PM +0100, cheuche+lkml@free.fr wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Hello, >>>> >>>>Along with the lockups already described here, I've noticed an >>>>unidentified source of interrupts on IRQ7. >>> >>>... >>> >>> >>>>I wonder if people experiencing lockup problems also have these >>>>noise interrupts, >>> >>> >>>I just took a look at this, by setting up parport_pc, and yes I get noise. >>> >>>This was my first sample with a kernel with APIC: >>> 7: 29230 IO-APIC-edge parport0 >> >>I just did an experminent with a very light kernel, nearly nothing >>compiled inside, except apic acpi, preempt and needed stuff plus >>scsi+libata and no ide. IRQ 7 was not present and every device had its >>own irq. Nevertheless system locked up at second hdparm run... >> >>Prakash