From: Bob <recbo@nishanet.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog - found
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 22:25:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FD3EF21.2050701@nishanet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031206081848.GA4023@localnet>
cheuche+lkml@free.fr wrote:
> ...................If you experience crashes with apic and your bios
> does not have such
>
>option, try athcool at
>http://members.jcom.home.ne.jp/jacobi/linux/softwares.html
>Its purpose is to *enable* cpu disconnect but can also disable it. Your
>best bet is to run it to disable cpu disconnect the soonest possible at
>boot.
>
>On the other hand, it isn't the cause of IRQ7 rogue interrupts. As I
>initially suspected, it seems now totally unrelated. The ACPI override
>handling may be buggy ? Since putting back the timer on IO-APIC-edge
>solves it.
>
>Nevertheless this is still a problem, other chipsets for Athlon
>processors seems to be able to have cpu disconnect and ioapic enabled
>without any crashes. But so far I don't see any thermal differences, I'm
>happy with that.
>
>Mathieu
>
I presently have /proc/interrupts
0: 244393560 XT-PIC timer
but when I tried nvnet driver and onboard
ethernet I think I saw both IRQ7 disabled
and some 8259A spurious interrupt err.
Presently there is no grep timer or TIMER
or 8259A in logs. 8259A has to do with
IO-APIC timer? It would make sense that
nvnet would see apic and lapic on in bios
and linux and look for io-apic timer as
well as apic table, then fail confused.
Is there a link to that patch? I keep deleting
this list it's huge so I lost a patch in a message.
-Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-08 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-05 20:56 Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog Allen Martin
2003-12-05 23:49 ` Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog - found? Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2003-12-05 23:55 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2003-12-06 0:15 ` Craig Bradney
2003-12-06 0:21 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2003-12-06 0:37 ` Craig Bradney
2003-12-08 3:08 ` Bob
2003-12-08 3:06 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-08 3:03 ` Bob
2003-12-06 8:18 ` Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog - found cheuche+lkml
2003-12-06 11:22 ` Julien Oster
2003-12-08 3:34 ` Bob
2003-12-08 8:13 ` Bob
2003-12-06 12:24 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2003-12-06 13:11 ` [PATCH] " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-06 15:10 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2003-12-06 15:37 ` Craig Bradney
2003-12-06 15:35 ` Vladimir Grebinskiy
2003-12-08 3:25 ` Bob [this message]
2003-12-08 3:18 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-08 10:43 Mikael Pettersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FD3EF21.2050701@nishanet.com \
--to=recbo@nishanet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).