From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261188AbTLHSOQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:14:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261190AbTLHSOQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:14:16 -0500 Received: from nelson.SEDSystems.ca ([192.107.131.136]:15065 "EHLO nelson.sedsystems.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261188AbTLHSOP (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:14:15 -0500 Message-ID: <3FD4BF6E.7070503@sedsystems.ca> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:14:06 -0600 From: Kendrick Hamilton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Linux Kernel and GPL section 2c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello all, I noticed the discussion about linux kernel modules that happened last week. I was wondering about something with regards to the linux kernel and Section 2c of the GPL. Why doesn't the kernel on booting print something about the kernel being free software licensed under the GPL, and shouldn't it? please CC responses to hamilton@sedsystems.ca Kendrick Hamilton