From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265871AbTLIOWI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:22:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265870AbTLIOWH (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:22:07 -0500 Received: from as13-5-5.has.s.bonet.se ([217.215.179.23]:41161 "EHLO K-7.stesmi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265869AbTLIOV4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:21:56 -0500 Message-ID: <3FD5DB3B.3070708@stesmi.com> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:24:59 +0100 From: Stefan Smietanowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Device-mapper submission for 2.4 References: <20031209115806.GA472@reti> <20031209134551.GG472@reti> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Måns Rullgård wrote: > Joe Thornber writes: > > >>>I believe 2.6 is the right place for the device mapper. >> >>So what's the difference between a new filesystem like XFS and a new >>device driver like dm ? > > > None. Neither will go into 2.4, if I've understood things correctly. > XFS is in latest BK. // Stefan