From: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
keescook@chromium.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, scott.branden@broadcom.com,
weiyongjun1@huawei.com, nayna@linux.ibm.com, ebiggers@google.com,
ardb@kernel.org,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
lszubowi@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, pjones@redhat.com,
"konrad.wilk@oracle.com" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] integrity: Introduce a Linux keyring for the Machine Owner Key (MOK)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 16:16:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FE0A686-81C6-4A36-8098-0549D87FBAA0@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210812185853.p5mgsgrftgwvt5fx@kernel.org>
> On Aug 12, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:18:42PM -0400, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>> Many UEFI Linux distributions boot using shim. The UEFI shim provides
>> what is called Machine Owner Keys (MOK). Shim uses both the UEFI Secure
>> Boot DB and MOK keys to validate the next step in the boot chain. The
>> MOK facility can be used to import user generated keys. These keys can
>> be used to sign an end-users development kernel build. When Linux
>> boots, both UEFI Secure Boot DB and MOK keys get loaded in the Linux
>> .platform keyring.
>>
>> Add a new Linux keyring called .mok. This keyring shall contain just
>
> I would consider ".machine" instead. It holds MOK keys but is not a
> MOK key.
I’m open to renaming it to anything that you and the other maintainers
feel would be appropriate. I just want to make sure there is an agreement
on the new name before I make the change. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-12 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-12 2:18 [PATCH v3 00/14] Enroll kernel keys thru MOK Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 2:18 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] integrity: Introduce a Linux keyring for the Machine Owner Key (MOK) Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 18:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-08-12 22:16 ` Eric Snowberg [this message]
2021-08-13 18:26 ` Nayna
2021-08-12 21:31 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-08-12 22:36 ` Eric Snowberg
2021-08-13 0:35 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-08-12 2:18 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] KEYS: CA link restriction Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 2:18 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] integrity: Trust MOK keys if MokListTrustedRT found Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 2:18 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] integrity: add add_to_mok_keyring Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 19:32 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-08-12 22:04 ` Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 2:18 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] integrity: restrict INTEGRITY_KEYRING_MOK to restrict_link_by_ca Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 2:18 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] integrity: accessor function to get trust_moklist Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 2:18 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] integrity: add new keyring handler for mok keys Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 2:18 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] KEYS: add a reference to mok keyring Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 2:18 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] KEYS: Introduce link restriction to include builtin, secondary and mok keys Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 2:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] KEYS: change link restriction for secondary to also trust mok Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 19:46 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-08-12 22:10 ` Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 22:14 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-08-12 2:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] KEYS: link secondary_trusted_keys to mok trusted keys Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 2:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] integrity: Do not allow mok keyring updates following init Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 2:18 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] integrity: store reference to mok keyring Eric Snowberg
2021-08-12 2:18 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] integrity: change ima link restriction to include mok keys Eric Snowberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FE0A686-81C6-4A36-8098-0549D87FBAA0@oracle.com \
--to=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lszubowi@redhat.com \
--cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=scott.branden@broadcom.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).