linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
To: peterhuewe@gmx.de, jarkko@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca
Cc: stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@mniewoehner.de,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jandryuk@gmail.com, pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de,
	l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com, lukas@wunner.de,
	p.rosenberger@kunbus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 13/14] tpm, tpm_tis: startup chip before testing for interrupts
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:53:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c8a9353-124a-4ace-320d-b3e811609502@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221124135538.31020-14-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>


On 24.11.22 14:55, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> From: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
>
> In tpm_tis_gen_interrupt() a request for a property value is sent to the
> TPM to test if interrupts are generated. However after a power cycle the
> TPM responds with TPM_RC_INITIALIZE which indicates that the TPM is not
> yet properly initialized.
> Fix this by first starting the TPM up before the request is sent. For this
> the startup implementation is removed from tpm_chip_register() and put
> into the new function tpm_chip_startup() which is called before the
> interrupts are tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c     | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h          |  1 +
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c |  5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> index 783d65fc71f0..370aa1f529f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> @@ -543,6 +543,30 @@ static int tpm_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>  	return rc;
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * tpm_chip_startup() - performs auto startup and allocates the PCRs
> + * @chip: TPM chip to use.
> + */
> +int tpm_chip_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> +{
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	rc = tpm_chip_start(chip);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	rc = tpm_auto_startup(chip);
> +	if (rc)
> +		goto stop;
> +
> +	rc = tpm_get_pcr_allocation(chip);
> +stop:
> +	tpm_chip_stop(chip);
> +
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_startup);
> +
>  /*
>   * tpm_chip_register() - create a character device for the TPM chip
>   * @chip: TPM chip to use.
> @@ -558,20 +582,6 @@ int tpm_chip_register(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>  {
>  	int rc;
>
> -	rc = tpm_chip_start(chip);
> -	if (rc)
> -		return rc;
> -	rc = tpm_auto_startup(chip);
> -	if (rc) {
> -		tpm_chip_stop(chip);
> -		return rc;
> -	}
> -
> -	rc = tpm_get_pcr_allocation(chip);
> -	tpm_chip_stop(chip);
> -	if (rc)
> -		return rc;
> -
>  	tpm_sysfs_add_device(chip);
>
>  	tpm_bios_log_setup(chip);
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> index 24ee4e1cc452..919bb0b88b12 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ static inline void tpm_msleep(unsigned int delay_msec)
>  		     delay_msec * 1000);
>  };
>
> +int tpm_chip_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip);
>  int tpm_chip_start(struct tpm_chip *chip);
>  void tpm_chip_stop(struct tpm_chip *chip);
>  struct tpm_chip *tpm_find_get_ops(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index ddaf362e62c1..94a2bfb244b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -1129,6 +1129,11 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
>  	/* INTERRUPT Setup */
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&priv->read_queue);
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&priv->int_queue);
> +
> +	rc = tpm_chip_startup(chip);
> +	if (rc)
> +		goto out_err;
> +
>  	if (irq != -1) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Before doing irq testing issue a command to the TPM in polling mode

Jarko, thanks for the review so far. What about this patch, are there any concerns from your side?

Regards,
Lino

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-28 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-24 13:55 [PATCH v11 00/14] TPM IRQ fixes Lino Sanfilippo
2022-11-24 13:55 ` [PATCH v11 01/14] tpm, tpm_tis: Avoid cache incoherency in test for interrupts Lino Sanfilippo
2022-11-24 13:55 ` [PATCH v11 02/14] tpm, tpm_tis: Claim locality before writing TPM_INT_ENABLE register Lino Sanfilippo
2022-11-24 13:55 ` [PATCH v11 03/14] tpm, tpm_tis: Disable interrupts if tpm_tis_probe_irq() failed Lino Sanfilippo
2022-11-24 13:55 ` [PATCH v11 04/14] tpm, tpm_tis: Do not skip reset of original interrupt vector Lino Sanfilippo
2022-11-28  1:26   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-11-24 13:55 ` [PATCH v11 05/14] tpm, tpm_tis: Claim locality before writing interrupt registers Lino Sanfilippo
2022-11-24 15:21   ` kernel test robot
2022-11-24 13:55 ` [PATCH v11 06/14] tpm, tpm_tis: Only handle supported interrupts Lino Sanfilippo
2022-11-24 13:55 ` [PATCH v11 07/14] tpm, tpm_tis: Move interrupt mask checks into own function Lino Sanfilippo
2022-11-24 13:55 ` [PATCH v11 08/14] tpm, tpm_tis: do not check for the active locality in interrupt handler Lino Sanfilippo
2022-11-24 13:55 ` [PATCH v11 09/14] tpm, tpm: Implement usage counter for locality Lino Sanfilippo
2022-11-28  1:28   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-11-24 13:55 ` [PATCH v11 10/14] tpm, tpm_tis: Request threaded interrupt handler Lino Sanfilippo
2022-11-24 13:55 ` [PATCH v11 11/14] tpm, tpm_tis: Claim locality in " Lino Sanfilippo
2022-11-24 13:55 ` [PATCH v11 12/14] tpm, tpm_tis: Claim locality when interrupts are reenabled on resume Lino Sanfilippo
2022-11-24 13:55 ` [PATCH v11 13/14] tpm, tpm_tis: startup chip before testing for interrupts Lino Sanfilippo
2022-11-28 12:53   ` Lino Sanfilippo [this message]
2022-12-04 17:02     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-12-04 17:01   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-11-24 13:55 ` [PATCH v11 14/14] tpm, tpm_tis: Enable interrupt test Lino Sanfilippo
2023-02-24 14:48 ` [PATCH v11 00/14] TPM IRQ fixes Lino Sanfilippo
2023-03-16 17:18   ` Michael Niewöhner
2023-03-19 13:53     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-04-21 16:50       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-04-21 19:34         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-04-21 19:35           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-04-22  0:59         ` Lino Sanfilippo
2023-04-23 14:15           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-04-23 15:36             ` Michael Niewöhner
2023-04-23 15:40               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-04-23 16:51                 ` Michael Niewöhner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3c8a9353-124a-4ace-320d-b3e811609502@gmx.de \
    --to=linosanfilippo@gmx.de \
    --cc=jandryuk@gmail.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@mniewoehner.de \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=p.rosenberger@kunbus.com \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).