Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Combine MediaTek MT67xx pinctrl binding docs

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>]

Il 21/09/22 12:24, yassine.oudjana@gmail.com ha scritto:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 21 2022 at 11:45:41 AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>> Il 21/09/22 11:30, yassine.oudjana@gmail.com ha scritto:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 21 2022 at 09:11:12 AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski 
>>> \x7f<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> On 20/09/2022 10:06, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>>>>  Il 19/09/22 19:01, Yassine Oudjana ha scritto:
>>>>>>  From: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Documents for MT6779, MT6795 and MT6797 that currently exist share
>>>>>>  most properties, and each one has slightly differently worded
>>>>>>  descriptions for those properties. Combine all three documents into
>>>>>>  one common document for all MT67xx SoC pin controllers, picking a few
>>>>>>  parts from each and accounting for differences such as items in reg
>>>>>>  and reg-names properties. Also document the MT6765 pin controller
>>>>>>  which currently has a driver but no DT binding documentation. It should
>>>>>>  be possible to also include bindings for MT8183 and MT8188, but these
>>>>>>  have some additional properties that might complicate things a bit,
>>>>>>  so they are left alone for now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>
>>>>>>  ---
>>>>>>    .../pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml      | 207 ------------------
>>>>>>    .../pinctrl/mediatek,mt6797-pinctrl.yaml      | 176 ---------------
>>>>>>    ...6795.yaml => mediatek,mt67xx-pinctrl.yaml} | 181 +++++++++++----
>>>>>
>>>>>  Hello Yassine,
>>>>>  nice cleanup over here!
>>>>>
>>>>>  There's a catch though: as far as I know, wildcards are not permitted... so you
>>>>>  should, at this point, merge all of these in mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml 
>>>>> instead.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Before jumping to that, though... Krzysztof, can you please confirm (or deny)?
>>>>
>>>> Wildcards are not allowed in compatibles. In filename wildcards or
>>>> family name could work if they are really going to match the devices. I
>>>> have doubts here. 67xx is quite a lot of different devices, so I am not
>>>> sure this will cover them all.
>>>>
>>>> I would prefer one name (oldest SoC or lowest number).
>>>
>>> Lowest number (and probably oldest too but not sure since mediatek naming 
>>> \x7fconventions are a bit weird) currently documented is mt6779, but mt6765 gets 
>>> \x7fdocumented in this patch and mt6735 (this one I know for sure is older than the 
>>> \x7frest) in a following patch, so do I just stick with mt6779 or do I change it in 
>>> the \x7ffollowing patches documenting mt6765 and mt6735?
>>>
>>
>> I see the sequence as:
>>
>> 1. You merge mediatek,mt6797-pinctrl.yaml into mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml; then
> 
> And mediatek,pinctrl-mt6795 gets merged here too I assume?
> 

Yeah sorry about forgetting that one. Anyway, obviously, do one merge operation
per commit!


>> 2. Adding MT6765 documentation to mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml; then
>> 3. Adding support for MT6735, documentation goes again to 6779-pinctrl.
>>
>> This means that you're working with mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml :-)
>>
>> P.S.: That was also a suggestion about how to split things per-commit!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Angelo
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Yassine
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
>