From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4B4C282C4 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 09:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AAD21773 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 09:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=wdc.com header.i=@wdc.com header.b="hTHlFZki" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728795AbfBLJUG (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:20:06 -0500 Received: from esa5.hgst.iphmx.com ([216.71.153.144]:34341 "EHLO esa5.hgst.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726049AbfBLJUF (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:20:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1549963206; x=1581499206; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0u22az8QufOyM/1E8fitgYFXGVFr+R6CmRAnfANUXRc=; b=hTHlFZkin7gwbXPgwB8cIXBEFdApvHfT/aAnyh9kBk+u48uXrlP0JL99 hG+CXmXD6PAEXB/kV9DXqw5WOfdCH/NH/IH6e+Ee50/Jew8txkUZo2CBm kt3o4aIWTDLQsGpSQUkdWGKYpAJrXuffa6+CmFvudAayldhZjfO73b89J hnaiwJQIujWuit5YHI2T+9PkmPgVTG8YBXDFGq/j9HDGqmNePfujV6Kdj rOK6cpzQU7iVgnNwRAxFKP1eSdTpd+9xAYzuAgaDgUhlCOQhwiWxrJQTu lcS6jvLgCqXxNLAEQUWLDUnNk7BOywEVNFtCj3UVOXx6FHo1HC5xQBRrN g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,361,1544457600"; d="scan'208";a="102300598" Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.15]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2019 17:20:05 +0800 Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com ([10.248.3.37]) by uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2019 01:00:41 -0800 Received: from ds141g2.ad.shared (HELO [10.86.48.95]) ([10.86.48.95]) by uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2019 01:20:05 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] riscv: use for_each_of_cpu_node iterator To: Johan Hovold Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Albert Ou , Andreas Schwab , Palmer Dabbelt , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Anup Patel , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" References: <20190118140308.9599-1-johan@kernel.org> <20190118140308.9599-6-johan@kernel.org> <20190212071339.GL26747@infradead.org> <20190212082621.GA26912@localhost> <6518a7ff-0586-be7a-4a43-6c9a35194a05@wdc.com> <20190212085345.GA28278@localhost> From: Atish Patra Message-ID: <3ceda2a6-72f1-bbab-96bd-5c1e91fff50a@wdc.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 01:20:03 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190212085345.GA28278@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/12/19 12:53 AM, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:47:09AM -0800, Atish Patra wrote: >> On 2/12/19 12:26 AM, Johan Hovold wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:13:39PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 03:03:08PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: >>>>> Use the new for_each_of_cpu_node() helper to iterate over cpu nodes >>>>> instead of open coding. Note that this will allow matching also on the >>>>> node name instead of the (for FDT) deprecated device_type property. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold >>>> >>>> I think this is going to conflict with the ELF caps changes from >>>> Atish. Maybe the riscv_fill_hwcap hunk should be included in his >>>> patch? >>> >>> Since that patch had some issues (e.g. the node reference underflow) it >>> may be better to rebase it on top of this series. The changes are >>> otherwise distinct after all. >>> >> >> I have fixed the node reference underflow issue and made some more >> changes based on comments. >> >> Some other patches(1,3,4,5) in this series may conflict with my series >> as well. I can rebase my series on top of yours and send it as one >> series if that's okay with you and Palmer. > > No need for you to resend these patches as they are reviewed any ready > to be merged. Just rebase your series and mention the dependency in the > cover letter as I did with Andreas's patch which this series depended > on. > Sure. I will do that. Regards, Atish > Thanks, > Johan >