From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161026AbcFCMsT (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:48:19 -0400 Received: from lucky1.263xmail.com ([211.157.147.134]:60942 "EHLO lucky1.263xmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932089AbcFCMsA (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:48:00 -0400 X-263anti-spam: KSV:0; X-MAIL-GRAY: 1 X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 0 X-KSVirus-check: 0 X-ABS-CHECKED: 4 X-ADDR-CHECKED: 0 X-RL-SENDER: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com X-FST-TO: mark.yao@rock-chips.com X-SENDER-IP: 220.200.4.132 X-LOGIN-NAME: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com X-UNIQUE-TAG: <2e83b937d2d4207db2294b746467f1cf> X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0 X-DNS-TYPE: 0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/6] clk: rockchip: rk3399: add SCLK_DDRCLK ID for ddrc To: =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=c3=bcbner?= , Shawn Lin References: <1464947719-6245-1-git-send-email-hl@rock-chips.com> <1464947719-6245-3-git-send-email-hl@rock-chips.com> <9d392979-0a20-ca74-9699-2440d07dddd3@rock-chips.com> <20637963.iQzVZfJq9f@diego> Cc: huangtao@rock-chips.com, dbasehore@chromium.org, Lin Huang , airlied@linux.ie, mturquette@baylibre.com, typ@rock-chips.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, dianders@chromium.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mark.yao@rock-chips.com From: Shawn Lin Message-ID: <3d6d3147-00de-8ba4-a27a-a8f89854f4f7@rock-chips.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 20:47:46 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20637963.iQzVZfJq9f@diego> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 在 2016/6/3 20:36, Heiko Stübner 写道: > Hi Shawn, > > Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016, 20:34:52 schrieb Shawn Lin: >> How about merge it into your patch#3. > > see comments from Doug and me on previous version. > > clock-ids should always be separate patches, as we will need them in both > clock and devicetree branches, so they must be in a separate branch shared > between clock and dts branches. > Ah, I missed the previous version as I think it should be from non-version to v2 rather than from non-version to v1, which IIRC is from Doug. :) Anyway, thanks for explaining this. > > Heiko > >> On 2016/6/3 17:55, Lin Huang wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Lin Huang >>> --- >>> Changes in v1: >>> - None >>> >>> include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h >>> b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h index 50a44cf..8a0f0442 100644 >>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h >>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h >>> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ >>> >>> #define SCLK_DPHY_RX0_CFG 165 >>> #define SCLK_RMII_SRC 166 >>> #define SCLK_PCIEPHY_REF100M 167 >>> >>> +#define SCLK_DDRCLK 168 >>> >>> #define DCLK_VOP0 180 >>> #define DCLK_VOP1 181 > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-rockchip mailing list > Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip > -- Best Regards Shawn Lin