From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A300C433F5 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C12600CC for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236615AbhJLM7v (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:59:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38114 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236326AbhJLM7t (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:59:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10AA6C061570 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 05:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id r7so66766969wrc.10 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 05:57:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9BRnICML+eh11SmOadr/4aabH8joUGg2Wy5/vcK4NCA=; b=k05qddI4yMu88qAtizX86dn+CSQ7sN6YlzZGwHC/ASkZAXkHZX2hPh/kjQJF0Q6WLf uMeg0bprEYDw/1ymRRz4N6JvPWYfxYB+tKd+DilwPwKEJveflVRPWzwj5slwRny2Fv00 ZwzUK9K7cZekAfkYsqx6BltBBgTqXzmiSR7v4nnDWfD4+8u3/cxulBQ0m1LIDs4eObxO LtI2i9uYFE1sm97ppjTCHsZehlFbIanMqM0c3vZJQUuMADJj9Y+OrAxozWtmGDWMk/N3 +zRsTb1mBdXTfFRMgdsrZr2soLzGHQPujDyk74s4pcFv29KcOG/jtbWVFrSZxR+lCKJ6 xdhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9BRnICML+eh11SmOadr/4aabH8joUGg2Wy5/vcK4NCA=; b=FZjF4vX8adshECP0dPWvwsasvEhncOMnnhnUp6Syv6xa1sVvZN4AuSaLt3QzP2Ko9G 6Dhpkkcth0GYryxYpVrAxImdTBwlp+IJXGRO9eD6ShoLWbx/GtjuAVbux3jGubzlhIW9 zOQQwFVDK4bMM/vb3SZQuNNh7GSfNxlxi+cGuRjjT+etCgXm0Fc8QX5GP+svsl8Ri4RJ kEObz4yHzIhZSD/rGM2zMqtTzA4XVrDd7MKNGfkOFD9sH5z2Mumqu3qGY4IL/5vh5kOP p68jAb3jaTENxVUbpNj5fUnO52jz9WrOW8RyMuNgIpZeiDHmtugcBWfacb8YMq/xx1tO FEFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Cp6xzVo15a9bamm85zu37H9hHazlb6qLbMgWBpArdWJPBANeB uPjuLFeJfvMTjKgOAKAC+HI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzLYzD62tUiHRV/dwDOcWPFQYWHFzpV3DkNYqm2qNlN/GuIXT0Ga4u8NFeMMlIaug2C56H0JQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7201:: with SMTP id n1mr5306097wmc.19.1634043466664; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 05:57:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.21] ([195.245.16.219]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m15sm2656721wmq.0.2021.10.12.05.57.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 05:57:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3ea0db23ab3284fdee2fec6cfc08026a0acccb6f.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] ep93xx: clock: convert in-place to COMMON_CLK From: Alexander Sverdlin To: Arnd Bergmann , Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Mark Brown , Russell King , Hartley Sweeten , Linus Walleij , Ard Biesheuvel , Andrew Morton , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Anshuman Khandual , Geert Uytterhoeven , YiFei Zhu , Mike Rapoport , Uwe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , "moderated list:ARM PORT" , open list , Nikita Shubin Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 14:57:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20210726140001.24820-1-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> <20210726140001.24820-9-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> <7f7acc8986aca1c895de732297b2995d05ec23e7.camel@gmail.com> <7ec1690ea0ca9f6538b8228f78e62b2f38405fd4.camel@gmail.com> <00781d5212bb4015064d07e762ae0695d16e834e.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 14:39 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Right, if everything else is in mainline, then having the last two patches > in the soc tree gets the job done the quickest. > > If any of the other patches are only in linux-next but not in mainline yet, > then it seems best for Mark to take the ASoC/i2s patch for v5.16, and I'll > take the last one for v5.17, or maybe queue it separately from the rest > and send that in the second half of the 5.16 merge window after everything > else has landed. correct, everything else is in mainline, only these two left floating. Should I resend them for soc patchwork? -- Alexander Sverdlin.