From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F31C2BC61 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 01:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F662082D for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 01:54:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A7F662082D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726441AbeJ3KqL (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 06:46:11 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:64959 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725885AbeJ3KqK (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 06:46:10 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Oct 2018 18:54:47 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,442,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="245433275" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2018 18:54:47 -0700 Received: from [10.251.20.185] (kliang2-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com [10.251.20.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC7405803FA; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:54:45 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCHES/RFC] Re: A concern about overflow ring buffer mode To: David Miller Cc: acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangnan0@huawei.com, jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, kan.liang@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org References: <20181029183258.GL21857@kernel.org> <097fb051-25e3-cdb6-570b-22c2e9f83861@linux.intel.com> <20181029.154226.179933039670602298.davem@davemloft.net> From: "Liang, Kan" Message-ID: <3ea21329-48ec-c353-2cfc-659fbf85421b@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:54:44 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181029.154226.179933039670602298.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/29/2018 6:42 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: "Liang, Kan" > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:32:40 -0400 > >> - struct annotation_options *annotation_options __maybe_unused) >> + struct annotation_options *annotation_options __maybe_unused, >> + atomic_t *nr_rb_read __maybe_unused) >> { > > What is going on with the indentations of this patch? > Sorry, my editor auto wraps the line. The patch has been sent in a separate email. Thanks, Kan