From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] blk-mq: Don't complete in IRQ, use llist_head
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 07:43:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4007ad55-ed6d-a081-8571-36b146bca5ed@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210123201027.3262800-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
On 1/23/21 1:10 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Patch 2+3 were applied and then dropped by Jens due to a NOHZ+softirq
> related warning [0]. Turns out a successful wakeup via
> set_nr_if_polling() will not process any softirqs and the CPU may go
> back to idle. This is addressed by patch #1.
>
> smpcfd_dying_cpu() will also invoke SMP-functions calls via
> flush_smp_call_function_queue() but the block layer shouldn't queue
> anything because the CPU isn't online anymore.
> The two caller of flush_smp_call_function_from_idle() look fine with
> opening interrupts from within do_softirq().
Applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-10 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-23 20:10 [PATCH v3 0/3] blk-mq: Don't complete in IRQ, use llist_head Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] smp: Process pending softirqs in flush_smp_call_function_from_idle() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-02-01 19:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-02-09 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-09 11:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-02-10 13:53 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-02-17 13:17 ` tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: Always complete remote completions requests in softirq Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25 7:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-01-25 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 8:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25 8:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 9:29 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25 8:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 8:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-27 11:22 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-01-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Use llist_head for blk_cpu_done Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25 8:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 8:32 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25 8:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 9:54 ` [PATCH 3/3 v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25 10:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-27 11:23 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-01-25 4:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] blk-mq: Don't complete in IRQ, use llist_head Jens Axboe
2021-02-10 14:43 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4007ad55-ed6d-a081-8571-36b146bca5ed@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).