From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269700AbUH0AD7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:03:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269819AbUH0ABA (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:01:00 -0400 Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.198.35]:38818 "EHLO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269699AbUHZXy1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 19:54:27 -0400 Message-ID: <412E782F.2030704@namesys.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:54:23 -0700 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Hellwig CC: Christophe Saout , Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, flx@namesys.com, torvalds@osdl.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins References: <20040825152805.45a1ce64.akpm@osdl.org> <412D9FE6.9050307@namesys.com> <20040826014542.4bfe7cc3.akpm@osdl.org> <1093522729.9004.40.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <20040826124929.GA542@lst.de> <1093525234.9004.55.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <20040826130718.GB820@lst.de> <1093526273.11694.8.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <20040826132439.GA1188@lst.de> <1093527307.11694.23.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <20040826134034.GA1470@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20040826134034.GA1470@lst.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The problem is not that it >doesn't work but that it's really hard to maintain. > You really like to talk about what you know nothing of, yes? Reiser4 is FAR easier to maintain than V3. Ask anyone on reiserfs-dev. It was designed to reduce our software maintenance costs.