From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752293AbdK2V7z (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:59:55 -0500 Received: from mailoutvs2.siol.net ([213.250.19.135]:32922 "EHLO mail.siol.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751828AbdK2V7y (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:59:54 -0500 From: Jernej =?utf-8?B?xaBrcmFiZWM=?= To: Julian Calaby Cc: Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , David Airlie , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , dri-devel , "Mailing List, Arm" , icenowy@aosc.io, linux-sunxi Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 11/17] drm/sun4i: Wire in DE2 scaler support Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:59:49 +0100 Message-ID: <4143236.xN3VOcVO54@jernej-laptop> In-Reply-To: References: <20171127205750.19277-1-jernej.skrabec@siol.net> <20171127205750.19277-12-jernej.skrabec@siol.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Julian, Dne sreda, 29. november 2017 ob 22:48:34 CET je Julian Calaby napisal(a): > Hi Jernej, > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Jernej Skrabec wrote: > > Calculate scaling parameters and call appropriate scaler set up > > function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_layer.c | 12 +++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c | 115 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.h > > | 4 -- > > 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_layer.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_layer.c index e1b6ad82145e..6860271e5415 > > 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_layer.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_layer.c > > @@ -41,9 +44,14 @@ static int sun8i_mixer_layer_atomic_check(struct > > drm_plane *plane,> > > clip.x2 = crtc_state->adjusted_mode.hdisplay; > > clip.y2 = crtc_state->adjusted_mode.vdisplay; > > > > + scaler_supported = !!(layer->mixer->cfg->scaler_mask & > > BIT(layer->id)); + > > + min_scale = scaler_supported ? 1 : DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING; > > + max_scale = scaler_supported ? (1UL << 20) - 1 : > > + DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING; > > + > > Disclaimer: I hate ternaries, but this looks like it'd be better > written as an if statement. I.e. > > min_scale = DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING; > max_scale = DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING; > > if (layer->mixer->cfg->scaler_mask & BIT(layer->id)) { > min_scale = 1; > max_scale = (1UL << 20) - 1; > } > > However the compiler will probably sort it all out anyway, so it > probably doesn't matter that much, except for style. That indeed looks much better. I will use it in next version. Thanks, Jernej > > Thanks, > > -- > Julian Calaby > > Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com > Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/