From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934711Ab3FSK7Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:59:24 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:54538 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934460Ab3FSK7X (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:59:23 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Robin Holt Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Russell King , Russ Anderson , "H. Peter Anvin" , Guan Xuetao , Linux Kernel Mailing List , the arch/x86 maintainers , Arm Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH -v11 resend 10/11] arm, change reboot_mode to use enum reboot_mode Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:58:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4169120.1k31YLDD12@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.3 (Linux/3.9.0-2-generic; KDE/4.10.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1370519244-49918-11-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> References: <1370519244-49918-1-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> <1370519244-49918-11-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:4cteXPBafsVkhjbwpkIwUPPi5sZnlHsS816uHPuAGVZ g3CGUOKWIDrjPkqTh9mZ9yQvFVa2h82lpaiWwb+RgPYz8KO27D nd6rFZrM3dSvQSkDMFG6n1xRXPbu2F2qUp58K06wDM6kpx66j9 ApkNnFNEUqmOn5nZ/ROp1qTSIqfZA6bIAgDDFHq7M8BTkLOlXd BjkW7iYqHVwqDiiSSrzPoWTNB5votuKU/4VO1k0QyqY8N1Rp9s invSvj2u6jfJQFQ2gN1a0uG0xpvHbVhMJUSXdBBcNJlQKBvUHE HA2t4kONJin3cR51uAax+Yx9bizOETW1TAi49/ojJ/aDtmj19I 9lOPaKjK5F1ASQJeGYeQ= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 06 June 2013 06:47:23 Robin Holt wrote: > Preparing to move the parsing of reboot= to generic kernel code > forces the change in reboot_mode handling to use the enum. > > Signed-off-by: Robin Holt > To: Andrew Morton > Cc: Russell King > Cc: Russ Anderson > Cc: Robin Holt > Cc: H. Peter Anvin > Cc: Guan Xuetao > Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List > Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers > Cc: Arm Mailing List > Acked-by: Russell King Should we merge this through the arm-soc tree? I'm getting a few conflicts with new platforms getting added using the old interface. Arnd