From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:43:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:43:18 -0400 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:25773 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:43:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 07:46:18 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Daniel Phillips , Paolo Ciarrocchi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cc: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [chatroom benchmark version 1.0.1] Results Message-ID: <418645270.1032421577@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> And now the results: >> 2.4.19-ck7.results:Average throughput : 55928 messages per second >> 2.4.19.results:Average throughput : 44851 messages per second >> 2.5.33.results:Average throughput : 59522 messages per second >> 2.5.34.results:Average throughput : 62941 messages per second >> 2.5.36.results:Average throughput : 60858 messages per second >> >> 2.4.19-ck7 is preemption ON >> 2.5.33 and 2.5.34 are preemption ON >> 2.5.36 is preemption OFF (Robert, 2.5.36 with preemption ON oops at boot) > > There's also some kind of hint that preemption improves throughput > here. Any chance of doing two runs on exactly the same kernel, one with preempt on, and the other with preempt off? That's a much nicer hint ;-) M.