linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@hist.no>
To: Tomas Carnecky <tom@dbservice.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel thoughts of a Linux user
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:07:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41A19E44.9080005@hist.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <419CFF73.3010407@dbservice.com>

Tomas Carnecky wrote:

> Gerold J. Wucherpfennig wrote:
> > - Replace DRI with sth. slimmer and intoduce real kernel drivers
>
>> and introduce real kernel drivers which handel all the initialization 
>> and interrupt handling (only minimal hardware abstraction). One goal 
>> is to
>> remove X.org's PCI magic. Ultimately this shall give framebuffer and X
>> the same basis. This was summarized on kerneltrap.org.
>
>
> Is it possible to have two or more 'workstations' on one computer?

Yes - thats what the "ruby" kernel patch is all about.  I have a computer
with two "workstations" at home.  Compared to two computers, it
saves space, power, parts,  and above all - administrative work.  Only one
machine to upgrade, secure, configure.

> A 'workstation' is a monitor, keyboard, mouse etc. tied together and
> represents a place where someone can work.
> I know it's possible to do this using a Xserver (running two Xservers on
> different virtual consoles, each with its own
> configuration/keyboard/mouse/monitor), but I'd like to realise it more
> low-level, on the level of virtual terminals, so that each 'workstation'
> would have it's own 'Ctrl+F1', 'Ctrl+F2' etc.

Sure - ruby gives you that.  X may need a patch in order to support
ctrl+F2... on the scond keyboard, as the second console uses vt numbers
from 17 to 32.

>
> Background:
> Today, you can buy video cards with two connectors for monitors, or even
> put two of those cards into one mainboard, making it possible to connect
> four monitors to one computer. A P4 HT enabled CPU would be enough for
> four office workers who edit text documents, unless they aren't playing
> games :) So you could cut costs by buying one set of Mainboard/CPU/RAM
> and then for every worker just a monitor/keyboard/mouse.
> Places like internet-cafes could profit, they usually have many same
> computers side by side, each with the same configuration, but on many no
> one is working, they just run and consume energy. 

Yes, you can do that.   The limit seems to be how many monitors you can
connect - there seems to be no practical limit to how many USB keyboards
& mice you can use.  The lengt of wires might also be a problem
with more than four.

Helge Hafting

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-11-22  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-18 17:59 Kernel thoughts of a Linux user Gerold J. Wucherpfennig
2004-11-18 18:50 ` Greg KH
2004-11-18 20:00 ` Tomas Carnecky
2004-11-18 20:46   ` Jan Engelhardt
2004-11-18 20:52     ` Tomas Carnecky
2004-11-18 21:05       ` Jan Engelhardt
2004-11-18 21:15     ` Chris Friesen
2004-11-18 21:17       ` Jan Engelhardt
2004-11-18 21:29         ` Chris Friesen
2004-11-19 12:02         ` Paulo Marques
2004-11-19 12:05           ` Jan Engelhardt
2004-11-20  2:14           ` Alan Cox
2004-11-22  8:07   ` Helge Hafting [this message]
2004-11-22  8:38     ` Jan Engelhardt
2004-11-24 10:23       ` Helge Hafting
2004-11-22 11:17     ` Tomas Carnecky
2004-11-24 10:20       ` Helge Hafting
2004-11-24 11:31         ` Tomas Carnecky
2004-11-28 19:10           ` Helge Hafting
2004-11-19  5:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-11-20 10:31 Gerold J. Wucherpfennig
2004-11-21 18:29 ` Greg KH
2004-11-22 21:33   ` Gerold J. Wucherpfennig
2004-11-22 18:40     ` Greg KH
2004-11-22 18:52     ` Måns Rullgård
2004-11-22  9:54 Adam J. Richter
2004-11-22 14:54 Adam J. Richter
2004-11-22 20:21 ` Maneesh Soni
2004-11-22 15:32 Adam J. Richter
2004-12-14 18:02 Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41A19E44.9080005@hist.no \
    --to=helge.hafting@hist.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom@dbservice.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).