From: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hmm_range_fault related fixes and legacy API removal v2
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:30:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41dbb308-fc9e-d730-ffb0-6ce051dff1e1@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190704164236.GP3401@mellanox.com>
On 7/4/19 9:42 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 03:02:08PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Hi Jérôme, Ben and Jason,
>>
>> below is a series against the hmm tree which fixes up the mmap_sem
>> locking in nouveau and while at it also removes leftover legacy HMM APIs
>> only used by nouveau.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - don't return the valid state from hmm_range_unregister
>> - additional nouveau cleanups
>
> Ralph, since most of this is nouveau could you contribute a
> Tested-by? Thanks
>
> Jason
>
I can test things fairly easily but with all the different patches,
conflicts, and personal git trees, can you specify the git tree
and branch with everything applied that you want me to test?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-08 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-03 22:02 hmm_range_fault related fixes and legacy API removal v2 Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-03 22:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: always return EBUSY for invalid ranges in hmm_range_{fault,snapshot} Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-03 22:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: move hmm_vma_range_done and hmm_vma_fault to nouveau Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-03 22:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] nouveau: remove the block parameter to nouveau_range_fault Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-03 22:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] nouveau: unlock mmap_sem on all errors from nouveau_range_fault Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-03 22:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] nouveau: return -EBUSY when hmm_range_wait_until_valid fails Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-03 22:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: remove the legacy hmm_pfn_* APIs Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-04 16:42 ` hmm_range_fault related fixes and legacy API removal v2 Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-08 17:30 ` Ralph Campbell [this message]
2019-07-08 17:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-05 12:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-09 14:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-09 19:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-22 9:44 Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-23 1:11 ` Ralph Campbell
2019-07-23 15:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-23 15:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-23 16:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41dbb308-fc9e-d730-ffb0-6ce051dff1e1@nvidia.com \
--to=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).