From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262195AbVBBBsu (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:48:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262202AbVBBBsu (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:48:50 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:37504 "EHLO parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262195AbVBBBsr (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:48:47 -0500 Message-ID: <4200316F.7030401@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:48:31 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Gibson CC: orinoco-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [0/8] orinoco driver updates References: <20050112052352.GA30426@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20050112052352.GA30426@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Gibson wrote: > Following are a bunch of patches which make a few more steps towards > the long overdue merge of the CVS orinoco driver into mainline. These > do make behavioural changes to the driver, but they should all be > trivial and largely cosmetic. OK, the changes look good, but I was waiting for the previous stuff you submitted to land in upstream. Could I convince you to rediff and resend against the latest 2.6.x snapshot? At the time you sent these, they conflicted with a previous cleanup you had sent, and that I had applied. Jeff