From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Witold Krecicki <adasi@kernel.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sil_blacklist - are all those entries necessary?
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:59:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4213EC86.9020108@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200502170143.00817.adasi@kernel.pl>
Witold Krecicki wrote:
> Dnia wtorek 15 luty 2005 21:29, napisałeś:
>
>>Dnia wtorek 15 luty 2005 17:52, napisałeś:
>>
>>>Witold Krecicki wrote:
>>>
>>>>in sata_sil.c there is:
>>>>sil_blacklist [] = {
>>>> { "ST320012AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE },
>>>> { "ST330013AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE },
>>>> { "ST340017AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE },
>>>> { "ST360015AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE },
>>>> { "ST380023AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE },
>>>> { "ST3120023AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE },
>>>> { "ST3160023AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE },
>>>> { "ST3120026AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE },
>>>> { "ST340014ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE },
>>>> { "ST360014ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE },
>>>> { "ST380011ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE },
>>>> { "ST3120022ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE },
>>>> { "ST3160021ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE },
>>>> { "Maxtor 4D060H3", SIL_QUIRK_UDMA5MAX },
>>>> { }
>>>>};
>>>>I've got ST3120026AS and I've been using it with SIL3112 without this
>>>>hack for a long time - without any negative effects. The same
>>>>impression on ST3200822AS - is there any way to check if it is REALLY
>>>>necessary? 15MB/s is not what I'd expect on SATA...
>>>
>>>It's necessary until we can prove otherwise. Simply running well
>>>without your drive in the blacklist means nothing -- you just haven't
>>>hit the error condition yet.
>>
>>So how can I proove it? Are there any tests? It's been running for over a
>>year, almost 24/7 and nothing...
>
> Still no response - so again:
> is there ANY way to test if this hack is necessary for specific model of a
> disk?
You need a bus analyzer, and need to test different sizes of FIS's. If
all possible sizes (2048 combinations) work on your device, the
blacklist entry is not needed.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-17 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-15 16:06 sil_blacklist - are all those entries necessary? Witold Krecicki
2005-02-15 16:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-15 20:29 ` Witold Krecicki
2005-02-17 0:43 ` Witold Krecicki
2005-02-17 0:59 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-02-17 1:05 ` Witold Krecicki
2005-02-17 18:45 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4213EC86.9020108@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=adasi@kernel.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).