From: Kaigai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
To: Guillaume Thouvenin <guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>,
hadi@cyberus.ca, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
jlan@sgi.com, LSE-Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, elsa-devel <elsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:38:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42247051.7070303@ak.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1109665299.8594.55.camel@frecb000711.frec.bull.fr>
Hello,
> I tested without user space listeners and the cost is negligible. I will
> test with a user space listeners and see the results. I'm going to run
> the test this week after improving the mechanism that switch on/off the
> sending of the message.
I'm also trying to mesure the process-creation/destruction performance on following three environment.
Archtechture: i686 / Distribution: Fedora Core 3
* Kernel Preemption is DISABLE
* SMP kernel but UP-machine / Not Hyper Threading
[1] 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 normal
[2] 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 with PAGG based Process Accounting Module
[3] 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 with fork-connector notification (it's enabled)
When 367th-fork() was called after fork-connector notification, kernel was locked up.
(User-Space-Listener has been also run until 366th-fork() notification was received)
Does this number have any sort of means ?
In my second trial, kernel was also locked up after 366th-fork() notification.
Currently, I don't know its causition. Is there a person encounted it?
# I wanted to say "[2] is faster than [3]" when process-grouping is enable, but the plan came off. :(
Thanks.
--
Linux Promotion Center, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-01 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-19 0:51 A common layer for Accounting packages Jay Lan
2005-02-19 1:16 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-21 6:51 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-22 20:11 ` [Lse-tech] " Jay Lan
2005-02-23 7:30 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-21 7:54 ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-02-22 20:26 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-23 7:07 ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-02-23 7:20 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-23 8:33 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-23 8:51 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-23 9:30 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-23 9:36 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-23 19:11 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-24 7:42 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-23 9:50 ` Tim Schmielau
2005-02-24 22:27 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-23 11:29 ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-02-23 20:48 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-25 5:07 ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-02-25 5:28 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-25 17:32 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-25 17:45 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-25 18:11 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-25 21:30 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-25 22:18 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-27 9:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-27 15:20 ` KaiGai Kohei
2005-02-27 14:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-27 19:27 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-28 1:59 ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-02-28 2:32 ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-28 5:17 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-02-28 7:20 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-28 7:39 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-28 8:04 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-02-28 12:10 ` jamal
2005-02-28 9:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-28 13:20 ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-28 13:40 ` jamal
2005-02-28 13:53 ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-28 9:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-28 14:10 ` jamal
2005-02-28 14:25 ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-28 15:31 ` jamal
2005-02-28 16:17 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-03-01 8:21 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-01 13:38 ` Kaigai Kohei [this message]
2005-03-01 13:53 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-01 14:17 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-03-02 4:50 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-02 8:58 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-02 9:06 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-02 9:25 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-02 15:30 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-01 20:40 ` Paul Jackson
2005-02-24 1:25 ` Paul Jackson
2005-02-24 1:56 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-24 2:07 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42247051.7070303@ak.jp.nec.com \
--to=kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=elsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=jlan@sgi.com \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).