From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F111EC6778F for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 12:47:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B771720891 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 12:47:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B771720891 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729038AbeGYN7F (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2018 09:59:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47318 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728927AbeGYN7D (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2018 09:59:03 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C222308625E; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 12:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A982308BDA9; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 12:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail21.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail21.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.24]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA503F7CB; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 12:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:47:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Pankaj Gupta To: Eric Blake Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, haozhong zhang , nilal@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, xiaoguangrong eric , kvm@vger.kernel.org, riel@surriel.com, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, david@redhat.com, ross zwisler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, hch@infradead.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, niteshnarayanlal@hotmail.com, imammedo@redhat.com, dan j williams , lcapitulino@redhat.com Message-ID: <4226742.54063347.1532522849803.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20180713075232.9575-1-pagupta@redhat.com> <20180713075232.9575-4-pagupta@redhat.com> <783786ae-2e85-2376-448c-1e362c3d4d48@redhat.com> <399916154.53931292.1532494899706.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3] qemu: Add virtio pmem device MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.116.240, 10.4.195.15] Thread-Topic: qemu: Add virtio pmem device Thread-Index: 6vgDseTXz9KGgRBkFfGIW55ClGoGrA== X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.24 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.49]); Wed, 25 Jul 2018 12:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > >> > >> This patch has no n/M in the subject line; but is included in a thread > >> that also has a 0/2 cover letter, as well as 1/2 and 2/2 patches in > >> separate mails. Is that intentional? > > > > Yes, kernel series has 0-2 patches and Qemu has this one. I thought its > > good to keep separate numbering for both the sets. > > Ah, that makes sense. The cover letter didn't make it obvious to me that > this was two separate series to two projects, but related enough that > both series have to be incorporated for the feature to work and thus > cross-posted under a single cover letter. Will try to make it more clear in next posting. Thanks, Pankaj