From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Joerg Sommrey <jo@sommrey.de>
Cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:43:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4228C87A.8080205@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050304203330.GA14557@sommrey.de>
Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:07:16PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>Joerg Sommrey wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:10:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Joerg Sommrey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:09:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Joerg Sommrey wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:43:59PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Joerg Sommrey wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Patch:
>>>>>>>>>>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/2.6.11-rc5-bk4-libata-dev1.patch.bz2
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Still not usable here. The same errors as before when backing up:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Please try 2.6.11 without any patches.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Plain 2.6.11 doesn't work either. All of 2.6.10-ac11, 2.6.11-rc5,
>>>>>>>2.6.11-rc5 + 2.6.11-rc5-bk4-libata-dev1.patch and 2.6.11 fail with the
>>>>>>>same symptoms.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Reverting to stable 2.6.10-ac8 :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Does reverting the attached patch in 2.6.11 (apply with patch -R) fix
>>>>>>things?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Still the same with this patch reverted.
>>>>
>>>>Does reverting the attached patch in 2.6.11 fix things? (apply with
>>>>patch -R)
>>>>
>>>>This patch reverts the entire libata back to 2.6.10.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I'm confused. Still the same with everything reverted. What shall I do
>>>now?
>>
>>Well, first, thanks for your patience in narrowing this down.
>>
>>This means we have eliminated libata as a problem source, but we still
>>have the rest of the kernel go to through :)
>>
>>Try disabling ACPI with 'acpi=off' or 'pci=biosirq' to see if that fixes
>>things.
>>
>
> I tried both settings with plain 2.6.11. Almost the same results, in my
> impression apci=off causes the failure to appear even faster.
Just to make sure I have things right, please tell me if this is correct:
* 2.6.10 vanilla works
* 2.6.11 vanilla does not work
* 2.6.11 vanilla + 2.6.10 libata does not work
[2.6.10 libata == reverting all libata changes]
Is that all correct?
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-04 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3Ds62-5AS-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-03-02 20:34 ` [SATA] libata-dev queue updated Joerg Sommrey
2005-03-02 22:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-03 19:32 ` Joerg Sommrey
2005-03-04 4:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 6:37 ` Joerg Sommrey
2005-03-04 7:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 17:49 ` Joerg Sommrey
2005-03-04 18:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 20:33 ` Joerg Sommrey
2005-03-04 20:43 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-03-04 22:06 ` Joerg Sommrey
2005-03-04 22:32 ` Joerg Sommrey
2005-06-07 7:00 Bene Martin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-04 6:08 Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04 15:17 ` Greg Stark
2005-06-04 17:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04 18:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-06-04 19:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04 19:15 ` Greg Stark
2005-06-04 19:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-05 2:25 ` Greg Stark
2005-06-05 2:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-05 5:30 ` Greg Stark
2005-06-22 16:15 ` Mark Lord
2005-06-22 20:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 3:39 ` Mark Lord
2005-06-05 2:40 ` Drew Winstel
2005-06-05 2:58 ` Jim Crilly
2005-06-06 16:01 ` Mark Lord
2005-06-07 1:57 ` Greg Stark
2005-06-07 11:20 ` Brad Campbell
2005-06-08 8:33 ` Mark Lord
2005-06-07 13:15 ` Brad Campbell
2005-06-08 8:37 ` Mark Lord
2005-06-07 13:51 ` Greg Stark
2005-06-08 10:30 ` Mark Lord
2005-06-08 8:51 ` Mark Lord
2005-06-07 13:09 ` Domenico Andreoli
2005-06-07 17:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-10 5:40 Jeff Garzik
2005-03-29 9:12 ` kern.petr
2005-03-08 11:20 Jeff Garzik
2005-03-02 2:40 Jeff Garzik
2005-02-19 8:40 Jeff Garzik
2005-02-19 16:58 ` Andre Tomt
2005-02-19 17:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-13 20:33 Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 6:52 Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 6:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 22:53 ` Rob van Nieuwkerk
2004-10-27 23:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-15 8:04 Jeff Garzik
2004-10-15 17:15 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4228C87A.8080205@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jo@sommrey.de \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).