From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753015AbcEKAIM (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2016 20:08:12 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:50007 "HELO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752303AbcEKAIL (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2016 20:08:11 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Paul Gortmaker Cc: Sinan Kaya , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/acpi: make evged.c explicitly non-modular Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 02:11:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4257824.pGqX1khh3q@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/4.5.0-rc1+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160509195928.GB18139@windriver.com> References: <1462819227-28297-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <5730E671.8070201@codeaurora.org> <20160509195928.GB18139@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, May 09, 2016 03:59:29 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote: > [Re: [PATCH] drivers/acpi: make evged.c explicitly non-modular] On 09/05/2016 (Mon 15:35) Sinan Kaya wrote: > > > +Rafael, > > > > On 5/9/2016 2:40 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > > The Makefile/Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: > > > > > > Makefile:acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY) += evged.o > > > > > > - > > > -module_platform_driver(ged_driver); > > > -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > > > +builtin_platform_driver(ged_driver); > > > > > > > Thanks, it looks good to me. I realized Rafael was missing in your post. > > I added him here. > > Thanks for spotting that. It looks like I fat fingered his "Cc:" line > into a "c:" at some point and I didn't notice his name was absent when > git gave me the summary of recipients before hitting send. :-( > > Would have been nice if git send-email had given me a warning, but I > guess there are so many different non-stanadard headers out there now, > it would be impossible to assume "c:" wasn't valid for someone.... No worries. If it goes to linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, I can find it. Patch applied, thanks!