From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932333AbWG0Idk (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 04:33:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932151AbWG0Idk (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 04:33:40 -0400 Received: from vsmtp14.tin.it ([212.216.176.118]:33203 "EHLO vsmtp14.tin.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932333AbWG0Idj (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 04:33:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4284.192.167.206.189.1153989192.squirrel@darkstar.linuxpratico.net> In-Reply-To: <20060727065603.GJ23701@stusta.de> References: <20060726124557.GB23701@stusta.de> <20060726132957.GH32243@opteron.random> <20060726134326.GD23701@stusta.de> <20060726142854.GM32243@opteron.random> <20060726145019.GF23701@stusta.de> <20060726160604.GO32243@opteron.random> <20060726170236.GD31172@fieldses.org> <20060726172029.GS32243@opteron.random> <20060726205022.GI23701@stusta.de> <20060726211741.GU32243@opteron.random> <20060727065603.GJ23701@stusta.de> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:33:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion From: "Luigi Genoni" To: "Adrian Bunk" Cc: andrea@cpushare.com, "J. Bruce Fields" , "Hans Reiser" , "Nikita Danilov" , "Rene Rebe" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, July 27, 2006 08:56, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> Said that pretending that KLive data has absolutely no significance at >> all and that you can't draw any conclusion at all from it, to me seems as >> wrong as pretending it to perfect. > > Possibly wrong conclusions about the general market share based on data > not having the quality for being the basis of such statements are worse than > having no data. Am I missing something, or it is not marketing what we are talking about? please I do not understand your point. For what I understand... I was not supposing reiser4 users to be so mutch, but this is very usefull because this means that there are more possibilities to test the code well and to fix bugs... This also means that there are people who feels the need of this filesystem for their work because they are not satisfied with the other filesystems, or because anyway with reiser4 they see that they get better results about the work they need to be done. And this is probably the most important point.