linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "chenxiaosong (A)" <chenxiaosong2@huawei.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<dhowells@redhat.com>, <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
	<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19,v2] VFS: Fix fuseblk memory leak caused by mount concurrency
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 18:38:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <429d87b0-3a53-052a-a304-0afa8d51900d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWawy0J9JfStEku0@kroah.com>

在 2021/10/13 18:11, Greg KH 写道:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 05:51:01PM +0800, ChenXiaoSong wrote:
>> If two processes mount same superblock, memory leak occurs:
>>
>> CPU0               |  CPU1
>> do_new_mount       |  do_new_mount
>>    fs_set_subtype   |    fs_set_subtype
>>      kstrdup        |
>>                     |      kstrdup
>>      memrory leak   |
>>
>> Fix this by adding a write lock while calling fs_set_subtype.
>>
>> Linus's tree already have refactoring patchset [1], one of them can fix this bug:
>>          c30da2e981a7 (fuse: convert to use the new mount API)
>>
>> Since we did not merge the refactoring patchset in this branch, I create this patch.
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-fsdevel/patch/20190903113640.7984-3-mszeredi@redhat.com/
>>
>> Fixes: 79c0b2df79eb (add filesystem subtype support)
>> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong2@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> v1: Can not mount sshfs ([PATCH linux-4.19.y] VFS: Fix fuseblk memory leak caused by mount concurrency)
>> v2: Use write lock while writing superblock
>>
>>   fs/namespace.c | 9 ++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> As you are referring to a fuse-only patch above, why are you trying to
> resolve this issue in the core namespace code instead?
> 
> How does fuse have anything to do with this?
> 
> confused,
> 
> greg k-h
> .
> 

Now, only `fuse_fs_type` and `fuseblk_fs_type` has `FS_HAS_SUBTYPE` flag 
in kernel code, but maybe there is a filesystem module(`struct 
file_system_type` has `FS_HAS_SUBTYPE` flag). And only mounting fuseblk 
filesystem(e.g. ntfs) will occur memory leak now.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-13 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-13  9:51 [PATCH 4.19,v2] VFS: Fix fuseblk memory leak caused by mount concurrency ChenXiaoSong
2021-10-13 10:11 ` Greg KH
2021-10-13 10:38   ` chenxiaosong (A) [this message]
2021-10-13 10:49     ` chenxiaosong (A)
2021-10-20 12:30       ` Greg KH
2021-10-26  2:18         ` chenxiaosong (A)
2021-10-26  5:45           ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=429d87b0-3a53-052a-a304-0afa8d51900d@huawei.com \
    --to=chenxiaosong2@huawei.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).