From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262740AbVFVDaX (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:30:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262727AbVFVD3j (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:29:39 -0400 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:59050 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262723AbVFVD0w (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:26:52 -0400 Message-ID: <42B8DA6D.9080608@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:26:37 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-6 (X11/20050513) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbenc@suse.cz Subject: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (wireless) References: <20050620235458.5b437274.akpm@osdl.org> <20050621141930.GB2015@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <20050621130250.78759088.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050621130250.78759088.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > >>Hi! >> >> >>>This summarises my current thinking on various patches which are presently >>>in -mm. I cover large things and small-but-controversial things. Anything >>>which isn't covered here (and that's a lot of material) is probably a "will >>>merge", unless it obviously isn't. >> >>I'd like to ask about 802.11 stack and ipw2100 in particular... Is it >>"small enough that it did not need mentioning"? >>Working wireless in mainline would be great... > > > That's up to Jeff. 802.11 stack is still too ipw-specific. Someone needs to get together another driver using 802.11 stack (such as HostAP, the original location of much of the code). So, the merge criteria is: something other than ipw uses it. Otherwise, it'll never be generic... Jeff, who has several SuSE wireless patches to merge still