From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262888AbVFVIeo (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:34:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262938AbVFVIcR (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:32:17 -0400 Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39]:9136 "EHLO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262933AbVFVI1m (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:27:42 -0400 Message-ID: <42B920FD.3090906@namesys.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 01:27:41 -0700 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik CC: David Masover , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ReiserFS List Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins References: <20050620235458.5b437274.akpm@osdl.org> <42B831B4.9020603@pobox.com> <42B87318.80607@namesys.com> <20050621202448.GB30182@infradead.org> <42B8B9EE.7020002@namesys.com> <42B8BB5E.8090008@pobox.com> <42B8E834.5030809@slaphack.com> <42B8F4BC.5060100@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <42B8F4BC.5060100@pobox.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: >> after it has undergone massive surgery, and Namesys is bankrupt, and >> users have given up and moved on to XFS. But the massive surgery should >> happen eventually, partly to make all filesystems better (see below), >> and partly to make the transition easier and more palatable for those >> who don't work for Namesys. > > And here is the crucial point. Reiser4 is usable and useful NOW, not > > We care about technical merit, not some random company's financial > solvancy. > > > Hmm, that must be why Daniel Robbins, the creator of the distro with the technically superior Gentoo approach, is still with us, yes? If you cared about technical merit, you would discuss benchmarks, yes?