From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262264AbVFXSQc (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:16:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263210AbVFXSQc (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:16:32 -0400 Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.198.35]:63691 "EHLO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262264AbVFXSQT (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:16:19 -0400 Message-ID: <42BC4DF5.3030904@namesys.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:16:21 -0700 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Al Viro CC: Alexander Zarochentcev , Lincoln Dale , Alan Cox , David Masover , Horst von Brand , Jeff Garzik , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ReiserFS List Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins References: <200506231924.j5NJOvLA031008@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <42BB31E9.50805@slaphack.com> <1119570225.18655.75.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42BB5E1A.70903@namesys.com> <42BB7083.2070107@cisco.com> <42BBAD0F.2040802@namesys.com> <20050624071159.GQ29811@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <42BBCC65.8060709@namesys.com> <20050624144522.GR29811@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20050624144522.GR29811@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Al Viro wrote: >On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 02:03:33AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: > > >>Al Viro wrote: >> >> >> >>>Have I missed the posting with analysis of changes in locking scheme >>>and update of proof of correctness? If so, please give the message ID. >>> >>>_That_ had been the major showstopper for any merges, IIRC. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Ah, the prince of helpfulness has arrived. >> >>Yes, as I remember, >> >> > >Kindly put some efforts into remembering the thread that contains e.g. >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109347094309283&w=2 > >If that work (summary: introduction of hybrid objects invalidates the >existing locking scheme for directories and that had lead at least to >several user-exploitable deadlocks described in details in the same >thread; current proof of correctness is in the tree, see >Documentation/filesystems/Directory-Locking.txt and at the very least >it needs to be updated) had been done - please, give the message ID >of posting with such update. If not - please, arrange getting it done. > > > > We disabled metafiles until we can fix this. With no metafiles, the issue does not exist. Thanks for your assistance with finding that problem. Hans