From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261792AbVF0Dsu (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:48:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261794AbVF0Dsu (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:48:50 -0400 Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.85]:36336 "EHLO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261792AbVF0Dsr (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:48:47 -0400 Message-ID: <42BF7723.2090801@namesys.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:48:51 -0700 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Masover CC: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Lincoln Dale , Gregory Maxwell , Horst von Brand , Jeff Garzik , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ReiserFS List Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins References: <200506240241.j5O2f1eb005609@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <42BCD93B.7030608@slaphack.com> <200506251420.j5PEKce4006891@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <42BDA377.6070303@slaphack.com> <200506252031.j5PKVb4Y004482@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <42BDC422.6020401@namesys.com> <42BE3645.4070806@cisco.com> <42BE563D.4000402@cisco.com> <42BE5DB6.8040103@slaphack.com> <200506261816.j5QIGMdI010142@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <42BF08CF.2020703@slaphack.com> <200506262105.j5QL5kdR018609@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <42BF2DC4.8030901@slaphack.com> <42BF3D8F.4060503@namesys.com> <42BF4570.9010405@slaphack.com> In-Reply-To: <42BF4570.9010405@slaphack.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Masover wrote: > Hans Reiser wrote: > > >David Masover wrote: > > > >>Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > >> > >> > >>>On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:58:07 CDT, David Masover said: > >> > >> > >>>>"Plugins" is a bad word. This user's combination of plugins is most > >>>>likely identical to other users', it's just which ones are > enabled, and > >>>>which aren't? If they are all included, I assume they play nice. > >> > >> > >>>Which ones are enabled. Exactly. > > > >Reiser4 plugins are not per user, but per kernel. They are compiled > >in. The model is intended to ease the development process, nothing > >more. Apologies if the naming suggests more. > > > But, to avoid confusion, the inclusion of a crytocompress plugin in a > given kernel doesn't mean that all files accessed from that kernel are > encrypted and compressed. It just means that you can pick an individual > file and set it to be transparently encrypted/compressed. > > That is what I meant by "enabled". Not per-user, but per-file. > You are correct.