linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-lkml@gmx.net>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Process with many NPTL threads terminates slowly on core dump signal
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:33:46 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <434D48FA.FD0439AA@tv-sign.ru> (raw)

Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
> Following up (belatedly) from my earlier message, I took Daniel 
> Jacobowitz's suggestion to investigate the result from booting 
> with "profile=2".  When running my program (shwon below) on 
> 2.6.14-rc4 to create 100 threads, and sending a core dump signal, 
> the program takes 90 seconds to terminate, and readprofile shows 
> the following:

I think the coredumping code in __group_complete_signal() is bogus
and what happens is:

group_send_sig_info(P, SIGQUIT):

	adds SIGQUIT to ->shared_pending

	__group_complete_signal:

		->signal->group_exit_task = P;

		for_each_thread(t) {
			P->signal->group_stop_count ++;
			// sets TIF_SIGPENDING
			signal_wake_up(t)
		}
	

Now, P receives the signal:

get_signal_to_deliver:

	if (->signal->group_stop_count > 0) // YES
		handle_group_stop():
			if (->signal->group_exit_task == current) { // YES
				->signal->group_exit_task = NULL
				return 0;
			}

	signr = dequeue_signal(); // SIGQUIT

	do_coredump:

		->signal->flags = SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT;

		coredump_wait:

			yield();


Now all other threads do:

get_signal_to_deliver:

	if (->signal->group_stop_count > 0) // YES
		handle_group_stop();
			if (->signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT) // YES
				return 0;

	signr = dequeue_signal(); // no pending signals
		// recalc_sigpending_tsk() DOES NOT clear TIF_SIGPENDING,
		// because it sees ->group_stop_count != 0.
	
	return 0;

TIF_SIGPENDING is not cleared, so get_signal_to_deliver() will be
called again on return to userspace. When all threads will eat their
->time_slice, P will return from yield() and kill all threads.

Could you try this patch (added to mm tree):
	http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=112887453531139
? It does not solve the whole problem, but may help.

Please report the result, if possible.

Oleg.

             reply	other threads:[~2005-10-12 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-12 17:33 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2005-10-13  8:41 ` Process with many NPTL threads terminates slowly on core dump signal Michael Kerrisk
2005-10-13 17:18   ` Oleg Nesterov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-22 12:13 Michael Kerrisk
2005-09-22 13:10 ` Michael Kerrisk
2005-09-24 15:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-12 13:34 ` Michael Kerrisk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=434D48FA.FD0439AA@tv-sign.ru \
    --to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=dan@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mtk-lkml@gmx.net \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).