From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8047C17442 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 23:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD7D215EA for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 23:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="BJukUM87" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729924AbfKHXDC (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 18:03:02 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:35966 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726227AbfKHXDC (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 18:03:02 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id r10so8814792wrx.3; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 15:03:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=udaxrt3XnrWEC9M1Y9RVfizXLl29vH9+UyOxjM3wuzc=; b=BJukUM87b/u/A3eKR2Lfv8KYlBkhbGzaaUHrPzcwFMUEdNodA+fWjoqNNlHBb41inA R/P5O93U0XRtphBDVSQOql65HwtoPCx8LYW41QokMedAaclecUmmXAB/ETV1D9kbOBN6 iHYma5Nit0POQz/0VV9XP/NdVGVemlDQd3UZFbXeSqEtF7vByCYTJyoN02NwcuAq79sz m9R8wVOUHVD0YtcYmemgZXQepiffKcfsNJNYHRyQtSGs/pBAesI1LwJcqtYupv6sBRSr 36RCIffAsB3SFI/2wsDOLHtjsrYoU7IhVv+6gc+MwBZ4cc50wMnYyXRSa/6GLKj0BAYL 38vA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=udaxrt3XnrWEC9M1Y9RVfizXLl29vH9+UyOxjM3wuzc=; b=l+TexfV9amPWKNM+13OMDyQg1jpsUuylLLKAlljAtyJOXTYbi92vS9YN3iYCmeZ4z0 FeCtiQfPw6dJ9Mgu8giyxJ6oYNxUg001noYXqU/XL8mrICy2FMhiNXKXqRRPy+/8WD0s Nlj3rcLswb0lW0gBhbi4wMYPEwxmt9bdrx6CX2t6+03wjRUG+rYIAskBaGugGr0rtNlY TtU0U2dBgYW+lka9MhlNqwCgbg6I78aOaNib1YMmH1YYqi6/qokxtFVNfhvafey7sVsb mDBq9NI660LxbdBE6zOlNlyZ9KlQy+hc5V5yNL/DS1N6okmwh5HrhOOagdokgPdqvyU2 CEjw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUQpaqSPYwnTraPpAOgKa657K3rZfq2+BCeoGcgq7iZKbBZpgzl O99PChnjwdF5qFYY6gM97PEs4ITs X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxiwZihi9yJa5OiKRp9+13b0HEM1W0hETCo+JyiFjFHFu1CHQu8lZRc/C2/0Ml7H5piFXRPow== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e74b:: with SMTP id c11mr11250549wrn.357.1573254180677; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 15:03:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.230.29.90] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t133sm12339914wmb.1.2019.11.08.15.02.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Nov 2019 15:03:00 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the scsi tree To: Bart Van Assche , Stephen Rothwell , James Bottomley Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Martin K. Petersen" , Dick Kennedy , James Smart References: <20191107145523.1792cafb@canb.auug.org.au> <3a7be3f6-7aea-3660-bf20-dd2563d479bf@acm.org> From: James Smart Message-ID: <43644d42-3dfe-1c8c-fe6d-a017bc06087e@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:02:56 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3a7be3f6-7aea-3660-bf20-dd2563d479bf@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/7/2019 7:51 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 11/6/19 8:01 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning: >> >> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function 'lpfc_cpumask_of_node_init': >> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:6020:6: warning: the address of >> 'cpu_all_bits' will always evaluate as 'true' [-Waddress] >>   6020 |  if (!cpumask_of_node(numa_node)) >>        |      ^ >> >> Introduced by commit >> >>    dcaa21367938 ("scsi: lpfc: Change default IRQ model on AMD >> architectures") > > Thanks Stephen for this report. A candidate fix has been posted: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20191107052158.25788-6-bvanassche@acm.org/T/#u > > > Bart. > > See revised fix at: https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=157325403920775&w=2 -- james