From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965050AbVL2ILX (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:11:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932592AbVL2ILX (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:11:23 -0500 Received: from smtp102.plus.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.206.235]:7542 "HELO smtp102.plus.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932591AbVL2ILW (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:11:22 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=XiKgW5SuMFRprKu9ZK17k+XDhX6Xgvb1wea6AAnT0hct9ZlkIzlwsiUox3fKGvPmH5nLtTAPRvKaU7cbqWsudWhrWjhW4NrzbAMVYrB7eblu+ST9r9qcaM2cxSiDz1LQiDcqDjCintBSYF/hDtyfFxNXET4VSHZqjnul4GjdhEw= ; Message-ID: <43B39A23.8000302@yahoo.com.au> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:11:15 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051007 Debian/1.7.12-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Williams CC: Paolo Ornati , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Con Kolivas , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [SCHED] Totally WRONG prority calculation with specific test-case (since 2.6.10-bk12) References: <20051227190918.65c2abac@localhost> <20051227224846.6edcff88@localhost> <43B1D551.5050503@bigpond.net.au> <20051228112058.2c0c1137@localhost> <43B29540.1030904@bigpond.net.au> <43B3545D.3010508@yahoo.com.au> <43B35986.90408@bigpond.net.au> In-Reply-To: <43B35986.90408@bigpond.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter Williams wrote: > Nick Piggin wrote: >> It isn't a dead scheduler any more than any of the other out of tree >> schedulers are (which isn't saying much, unfortunately). > > > Ingosched, staircase and my SPA schedulers are all evolving slowly. > Are there any out there that I don't have in PlugSched that you think > should be? > Not that I know of... >> >> I've probably got a small number of cleanups and microoptimisations >> relative to what you have (I can't remember exactly what you sucked up) >> ... but other than that there hasn't been much development work done for >> some time because there is not much wrong with it. >> > > I was starting to think that you'd lost interest in this which is why I > said it was more or less dead. Sorry. > No worries. I haven't lost interest so much as people seem to be fairly happy with the current scheduler and least aren't busting my door down for updates to nicksched ;) I'll do a resynch for 2.6.15 though. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com