From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161176AbWAHKda (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 05:33:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161177AbWAHKda (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 05:33:30 -0500 Received: from mail.tv-sign.ru ([213.234.233.51]:6609 "EHLO several.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161176AbWAHKd3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 05:33:29 -0500 Message-ID: <43C0FC4B.567D18DC@tv-sign.ru> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:49:31 +0300 From: Oleg Nesterov X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai Cc: Christoph Lameter , Shai Fultheim , Nippun Goel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] Avoid taking global tasklist_lock for single threadedprocess at getrusage() References: <43AD8AF6.387B357A@tv-sign.ru> <43B2874F.F41A9299@tv-sign.ru> <20051228183345.GA3755@localhost.localdomain> <20051228225752.GB3755@localhost.localdomain> <43B57515.967F53E3@tv-sign.ru> <20060104231600.GA3664@localhost.localdomain> <43BD70AD.21FC6862@tv-sign.ru> <20060106094627.GA4272@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sorry for delay, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote: > > static void k_getrusage(struct task_struct *p, int who, struct rusage *r) > @@ -1681,14 +1697,22 @@ static void k_getrusage(struct task_stru > struct task_struct *t; > unsigned long flags; > cputime_t utime, stime; > + int need_lock = 0; Unneeded initialization > memset((char *) r, 0, sizeof *r); > - > - if (unlikely(!p->signal)) > - return; > - > utime = stime = cputime_zero; > > + need_lock = !(p == current && thread_group_empty(p)); > + if (need_lock) { > + read_lock(&tasklist_lock); > + if (unlikely(!p->signal)) { > + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); > + return; > + } > + } else > + /* See locking comments above */ > + smp_rmb(); This patch doesn't try to optimize ->sighand.siglock locking, and I think this is right. But this also means we don't need rmb() here. It was needed to protect against "another thread just exited, cpu can read ->c* values before thread_group_empty() without taking siglock" case, now it is not possible. Oleg.