From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750741AbWBMPiz (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:38:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750746AbWBMPiz (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:38:55 -0500 Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de ([193.174.154.14]:26053 "EHLO mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750741AbWBMPiy (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:38:54 -0500 From: Joerg Schilling Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:36:17 +0100 To: seanlkml@sympatico.ca, schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de Cc: schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de, sam@vilain.net, peter.read@gmail.com, mj@ucw.cz, matthias.andree@gmx.de, lkml@dervishd.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim@why.dont.jablowme.net, jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Message-ID: <43F0A771.nailKUS131LLIA@burner> References: <20060208162828.GA17534@voodoo> <43EA1D26.nail40E11SL53@burner> <20060208165330.GB17534@voodoo> <43EB0DEB.nail52A1LVGUO@burner> <43EB7210.nailIDH2JUBZE@burner> <43EB7BBA.nailIFG412CGY@burner> <43EC71FB.nailISD31LRCB@burner> <20060210114930.GC2750@DervishD> <43EC88B8.nailISDH1Q8XR@burner> <43EFC1FF.7030103@vilain.net> <43F097AE.nailKUSK1MJ9O@burner> <20060213095038.03247484.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <20060213095038.03247484.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> User-Agent: nail 11.2 8/15/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org sean wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:29:02 +0100 > Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > When looking at the current discussion, it seems to me that most people > > here are still not interested in a fix. > > Most people don't see a problem to fix. Your arguments have been roundly > refuted. On top of which, cdrecord works on Linux just fine already when > you pass the device node on the command line. There just isn't much > motivation to pursue a fix for some theoretical problem that doesn't affect > real users in practice. Since you are the only one who sees this as a huge > problem you should invest in providing a patch that can be reviewed for > inclusion. So you like to prove that it makes not sense to talk to LKML people? If there is no interest to fox well known bugs in Linux, I would need to warn people from using Linux. Jörg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily