From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030331AbWBVXNb (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:13:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030334AbWBVXNb (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:13:31 -0500 Received: from mail.tv-sign.ru ([213.234.233.51]:15849 "EHLO several.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030331AbWBVXNa (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:13:30 -0500 Message-ID: <43FCEF68.BE296D49@tv-sign.ru> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 02:10:32 +0300 From: Oleg Nesterov X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "Paul E. McKenney" , "Eric W. Biederman" , David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] revert "Optimize sys_times for a single threadprocess" References: <43FCE6AC.ED8BC108@tv-sign.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > tasklist_lock in sys_times() will be eliminated completely > > by further patch. > > Where is that patch? The patch would simply drop the locks? Just sent it: "[PATCH 1/6] sys_times: don't take tasklist_lock" It only drops tasklist_lock, sighand->siglock is still needed, of course. Oleg.