linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Set device flag indicating only 32-bit MSI support
@ 2020-11-17 14:57 Vidya Sagar
  2020-11-20 21:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2020-11-24 10:50 ` [PATCH V2] " Vidya Sagar
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Vidya Sagar @ 2020-11-17 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, lorenzo.pieralisi, thierry.reding, jonathanh
  Cc: linux-pci, linux-kernel, kthota, mmaddireddy, vidyas, sagar.tv

There are devices (Ex:- Marvell SATA controller) that don't support
64-bit MSIs and the same is advertised through their MSI capability
register. Set no_64bit_msi flag explicitly for such devices in the
MSI setup code so that the msi_verify_entries() API would catch
if the MSI arch code tries to use 64-bit MSI.

Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/pci/msi.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index d52d118979a6..af49da28854e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -581,10 +581,12 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd)
 	entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap	= (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK) >> 1;
 	entry->msi_attrib.multiple	= ilog2(__roundup_pow_of_two(nvec));
 
-	if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT)
+	if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) {
 		entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64;
-	else
+	} else {
 		entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32;
+		dev->no_64bit_msi = 1;
+	}
 
 	/* Save the initial mask status */
 	if (entry->msi_attrib.maskbit)
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Set device flag indicating only 32-bit MSI support
  2020-11-17 14:57 [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Set device flag indicating only 32-bit MSI support Vidya Sagar
@ 2020-11-20 21:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2020-11-24  3:57   ` Vidya Sagar
  2020-11-24 10:50 ` [PATCH V2] " Vidya Sagar
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2020-11-20 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vidya Sagar
  Cc: bhelgaas, lorenzo.pieralisi, thierry.reding, jonathanh,
	linux-pci, linux-kernel, kthota, mmaddireddy, sagar.tv

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 08:27:28PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> There are devices (Ex:- Marvell SATA controller) that don't support
> 64-bit MSIs and the same is advertised through their MSI capability
> register. 

I *think* you're saying these devices behave correctly per spec: they
don't support 64-bit MSI, and they don't advertise support for 64-bit
MSI.  Right?

> Set no_64bit_msi flag explicitly for such devices in the
> MSI setup code so that the msi_verify_entries() API would catch
> if the MSI arch code tries to use 64-bit MSI.

And you want msi_verify_entries() to catch attempts by the arch code
to assign a 64-bit MSI address?

That sounds OK, but the error message ("Device has broken 64-bit MSI")
is not appropriate if the device is actually *not* broken.

> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/msi.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index d52d118979a6..af49da28854e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -581,10 +581,12 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd)
>  	entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap	= (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK) >> 1;
>  	entry->msi_attrib.multiple	= ilog2(__roundup_pow_of_two(nvec));
>  
> -	if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT)
> +	if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) {
>  		entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64;
> -	else
> +	} else {
>  		entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32;
> +		dev->no_64bit_msi = 1;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Save the initial mask status */
>  	if (entry->msi_attrib.maskbit)
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Set device flag indicating only 32-bit MSI support
  2020-11-20 21:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2020-11-24  3:57   ` Vidya Sagar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Vidya Sagar @ 2020-11-24  3:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas
  Cc: bhelgaas, lorenzo.pieralisi, thierry.reding, jonathanh,
	linux-pci, linux-kernel, kthota, mmaddireddy, sagar.tv



On 11/21/2020 3:00 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 08:27:28PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>> There are devices (Ex:- Marvell SATA controller) that don't support
>> 64-bit MSIs and the same is advertised through their MSI capability
>> register.
> 
> I *think* you're saying these devices behave correctly per spec: they
> don't support 64-bit MSI, and they don't advertise support for 64-bit
> MSI.  Right?
Yes. That is what I intended to say.

> 
>> Set no_64bit_msi flag explicitly for such devices in the
>> MSI setup code so that the msi_verify_entries() API would catch
>> if the MSI arch code tries to use 64-bit MSI.
> 
> And you want msi_verify_entries() to catch attempts by the arch code
> to assign a 64-bit MSI address?
Yes.

> 
> That sounds OK, but the error message ("Device has broken 64-bit MSI")
> is not appropriate if the device is actually *not* broken.
Ok. I didn't change the existing error message. I'll change it to cover 
both the scenarios i.e. either the device is broken or the device 
doesn't really support 64-bit MSI.

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/msi.c | 6 ++++--
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
>> index d52d118979a6..af49da28854e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
>> @@ -581,10 +581,12 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd)
>>        entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap     = (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK) >> 1;
>>        entry->msi_attrib.multiple      = ilog2(__roundup_pow_of_two(nvec));
>>
>> -     if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT)
>> +     if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) {
>>                entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64;
>> -     else
>> +     } else {
>>                entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32;
>> +             dev->no_64bit_msi = 1;
>> +     }
>>
>>        /* Save the initial mask status */
>>        if (entry->msi_attrib.maskbit)
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2] PCI/MSI: Set device flag indicating only 32-bit MSI support
  2020-11-17 14:57 [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Set device flag indicating only 32-bit MSI support Vidya Sagar
  2020-11-20 21:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2020-11-24 10:50 ` Vidya Sagar
  2020-12-03  5:00   ` Vidya Sagar
  2020-12-03 18:24   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Vidya Sagar @ 2020-11-24 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, lorenzo.pieralisi, thierry.reding, jonathanh
  Cc: linux-pci, linux-kernel, kthota, mmaddireddy, vidyas, sagar.tv

There are devices (Ex:- Marvell SATA controller) that don't support
64-bit MSIs and the same is advertised through their MSI capability
register. Set no_64bit_msi flag explicitly for such devices in the
MSI setup code so that the msi_verify_entries() API would catch
if the MSI arch code tries to use 64-bit MSI.

Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
---
V2:
* Addressed Bjorn's comment and changed the error message

 drivers/pci/msi.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index d52d118979a6..8de5ba6b4a59 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -581,10 +581,12 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd)
 	entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap	= (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK) >> 1;
 	entry->msi_attrib.multiple	= ilog2(__roundup_pow_of_two(nvec));
 
-	if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT)
+	if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) {
 		entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64;
-	else
+	} else {
 		entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32;
+		dev->no_64bit_msi = 1;
+	}
 
 	/* Save the initial mask status */
 	if (entry->msi_attrib.maskbit)
@@ -602,8 +604,9 @@ static int msi_verify_entries(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev) {
 		if (!dev->no_64bit_msi || !entry->msg.address_hi)
 			continue;
-		pci_err(dev, "Device has broken 64-bit MSI but arch"
-			" tried to assign one above 4G\n");
+		pci_err(dev, "Device has either broken 64-bit MSI or "
+			"only 32-bit MSI support but "
+			"arch tried to assign one above 4G\n");
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 	return 0;
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] PCI/MSI: Set device flag indicating only 32-bit MSI support
  2020-11-24 10:50 ` [PATCH V2] " Vidya Sagar
@ 2020-12-03  5:00   ` Vidya Sagar
  2020-12-03 18:24   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Vidya Sagar @ 2020-12-03  5:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, lorenzo.pieralisi, thierry.reding, jonathanh
  Cc: linux-pci, linux-kernel, kthota, mmaddireddy, sagar.tv

Hi Bjorn,
Do you have any further comments for this patch?

Thanks,
Vidya Sagar

On 11/24/2020 4:20 PM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> There are devices (Ex:- Marvell SATA controller) that don't support
> 64-bit MSIs and the same is advertised through their MSI capability
> register. Set no_64bit_msi flag explicitly for such devices in the
> MSI setup code so that the msi_verify_entries() API would catch
> if the MSI arch code tries to use 64-bit MSI.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
> ---
> V2:
> * Addressed Bjorn's comment and changed the error message
> 
>   drivers/pci/msi.c | 11 +++++++----
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index d52d118979a6..8de5ba6b4a59 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -581,10 +581,12 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd)
>   	entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap	= (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK) >> 1;
>   	entry->msi_attrib.multiple	= ilog2(__roundup_pow_of_two(nvec));
>   
> -	if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT)
> +	if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) {
>   		entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64;
> -	else
> +	} else {
>   		entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32;
> +		dev->no_64bit_msi = 1;
> +	}
>   
>   	/* Save the initial mask status */
>   	if (entry->msi_attrib.maskbit)
> @@ -602,8 +604,9 @@ static int msi_verify_entries(struct pci_dev *dev)
>   	for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev) {
>   		if (!dev->no_64bit_msi || !entry->msg.address_hi)
>   			continue;
> -		pci_err(dev, "Device has broken 64-bit MSI but arch"
> -			" tried to assign one above 4G\n");
> +		pci_err(dev, "Device has either broken 64-bit MSI or "
> +			"only 32-bit MSI support but "
> +			"arch tried to assign one above 4G\n");
>   		return -EIO;
>   	}
>   	return 0;
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] PCI/MSI: Set device flag indicating only 32-bit MSI support
  2020-11-24 10:50 ` [PATCH V2] " Vidya Sagar
  2020-12-03  5:00   ` Vidya Sagar
@ 2020-12-03 18:24   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2020-12-03 19:03     ` Vidya Sagar
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2020-12-03 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vidya Sagar
  Cc: bhelgaas, lorenzo.pieralisi, thierry.reding, jonathanh,
	linux-pci, linux-kernel, kthota, mmaddireddy, sagar.tv

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 04:20:35PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> There are devices (Ex:- Marvell SATA controller) that don't support
> 64-bit MSIs and the same is advertised through their MSI capability
> register. Set no_64bit_msi flag explicitly for such devices in the
> MSI setup code so that the msi_verify_entries() API would catch
> if the MSI arch code tries to use 64-bit MSI.

This seems good to me.  I'll post a possible revision to set
dev->no_64bit_msi in the device enumeration path instead of in the IRQ
allocation path, since it's really a property of the device, not of
the msi_desc.

I like the extra checking this gives us.  Was this prompted by
tripping over something, or is it something you noticed by code
reading?  If the former, a hint about what was wrong and how it's
being fixed would be useful.

> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
> ---
> V2:
> * Addressed Bjorn's comment and changed the error message
> 
>  drivers/pci/msi.c | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index d52d118979a6..8de5ba6b4a59 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -581,10 +581,12 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd)
>  	entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap	= (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK) >> 1;
>  	entry->msi_attrib.multiple	= ilog2(__roundup_pow_of_two(nvec));
>  
> -	if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT)
> +	if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) {
>  		entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64;
> -	else
> +	} else {
>  		entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32;
> +		dev->no_64bit_msi = 1;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Save the initial mask status */
>  	if (entry->msi_attrib.maskbit)
> @@ -602,8 +604,9 @@ static int msi_verify_entries(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev) {
>  		if (!dev->no_64bit_msi || !entry->msg.address_hi)
>  			continue;
> -		pci_err(dev, "Device has broken 64-bit MSI but arch"
> -			" tried to assign one above 4G\n");
> +		pci_err(dev, "Device has either broken 64-bit MSI or "
> +			"only 32-bit MSI support but "
> +			"arch tried to assign one above 4G\n");
>  		return -EIO;
>  	}
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] PCI/MSI: Set device flag indicating only 32-bit MSI support
  2020-12-03 18:24   ` Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2020-12-03 19:03     ` Vidya Sagar
  2020-12-03 19:54       ` Bjorn Helgaas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Vidya Sagar @ 2020-12-03 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas
  Cc: bhelgaas, lorenzo.pieralisi, thierry.reding, jonathanh,
	linux-pci, linux-kernel, kthota, mmaddireddy, sagar.tv



On 12/3/2020 11:54 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 04:20:35PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>> There are devices (Ex:- Marvell SATA controller) that don't support
>> 64-bit MSIs and the same is advertised through their MSI capability
>> register. Set no_64bit_msi flag explicitly for such devices in the
>> MSI setup code so that the msi_verify_entries() API would catch
>> if the MSI arch code tries to use 64-bit MSI.
> 
> This seems good to me.  I'll post a possible revision to set
> dev->no_64bit_msi in the device enumeration path instead of in the IRQ
> allocation path, since it's really a property of the device, not of
> the msi_desc.
> 
> I like the extra checking this gives us.  Was this prompted by
> tripping over something, or is it something you noticed by code
> reading?  If the former, a hint about what was wrong and how it's
> being fixed would be useful.
I observed functionality issue with Marvell SATA controller (1b4b:9171) 
when the allocated MSI target address was a 64-bit address. I mentioned 
the Marvell SATA controller as an example in the commit message.

Thanks,
Vidya Sagar

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> V2:
>> * Addressed Bjorn's comment and changed the error message
>>
>>   drivers/pci/msi.c | 11 +++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
>> index d52d118979a6..8de5ba6b4a59 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
>> @@ -581,10 +581,12 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd)
>>        entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap     = (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK) >> 1;
>>        entry->msi_attrib.multiple      = ilog2(__roundup_pow_of_two(nvec));
>>
>> -     if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT)
>> +     if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) {
>>                entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64;
>> -     else
>> +     } else {
>>                entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32;
>> +             dev->no_64bit_msi = 1;
>> +     }
>>
>>        /* Save the initial mask status */
>>        if (entry->msi_attrib.maskbit)
>> @@ -602,8 +604,9 @@ static int msi_verify_entries(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>        for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev) {
>>                if (!dev->no_64bit_msi || !entry->msg.address_hi)
>>                        continue;
>> -             pci_err(dev, "Device has broken 64-bit MSI but arch"
>> -                     " tried to assign one above 4G\n");
>> +             pci_err(dev, "Device has either broken 64-bit MSI or "
>> +                     "only 32-bit MSI support but "
>> +                     "arch tried to assign one above 4G\n");
>>                return -EIO;
>>        }
>>        return 0;
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] PCI/MSI: Set device flag indicating only 32-bit MSI support
  2020-12-03 19:03     ` Vidya Sagar
@ 2020-12-03 19:54       ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2020-12-04  2:28         ` Vidya Sagar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2020-12-03 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vidya Sagar
  Cc: bhelgaas, lorenzo.pieralisi, thierry.reding, jonathanh,
	linux-pci, linux-kernel, kthota, mmaddireddy, sagar.tv

On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:33:45AM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> On 12/3/2020 11:54 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 04:20:35PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> > > There are devices (Ex:- Marvell SATA controller) that don't support
> > > 64-bit MSIs and the same is advertised through their MSI capability
> > > register. Set no_64bit_msi flag explicitly for such devices in the
> > > MSI setup code so that the msi_verify_entries() API would catch
> > > if the MSI arch code tries to use 64-bit MSI.
> > 
> > This seems good to me.  I'll post a possible revision to set
> > dev->no_64bit_msi in the device enumeration path instead of in the IRQ
> > allocation path, since it's really a property of the device, not of
> > the msi_desc.
> > 
> > I like the extra checking this gives us.  Was this prompted by
> > tripping over something, or is it something you noticed by code
> > reading?  If the former, a hint about what was wrong and how it's
> > being fixed would be useful.
> I observed functionality issue with Marvell SATA controller (1b4b:9171) when
> the allocated MSI target address was a 64-bit address. I mentioned the
> Marvell SATA controller as an example in the commit message.

I know you mentioned the Marvell controller, but apparently that
device is working perfectly correctly: it does not support 64-bit MSI,
and it does not advertise support for 64-bit MSI.

So if there's a functionality issue, that means something is wrong in
Linux that caused us to assign a 64-bit MSI address to it.  *That*
issue is what I want to know about.  Your patch only warns about the
issue; it doesn't fix it.

I don't think there's any point in specifically mentioning the Marvell
device if it is working correctly, because the same issue should
affect *any* device that doesn't support 64-bit MSI.  But if there's
some arch code that incorrectly assigns a 64-bit address, it would
definitely be useful to specify the arch.  And hopefully there's a fix
for that arch code, too.

> > > Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
> > > ---
> > > V2:
> > > * Addressed Bjorn's comment and changed the error message
> > > 
> > >   drivers/pci/msi.c | 11 +++++++----
> > >   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> > > index d52d118979a6..8de5ba6b4a59 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> > > @@ -581,10 +581,12 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd)
> > >        entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap     = (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK) >> 1;
> > >        entry->msi_attrib.multiple      = ilog2(__roundup_pow_of_two(nvec));
> > > 
> > > -     if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT)
> > > +     if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) {
> > >                entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64;
> > > -     else
> > > +     } else {
> > >                entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32;
> > > +             dev->no_64bit_msi = 1;
> > > +     }
> > > 
> > >        /* Save the initial mask status */
> > >        if (entry->msi_attrib.maskbit)
> > > @@ -602,8 +604,9 @@ static int msi_verify_entries(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > >        for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev) {
> > >                if (!dev->no_64bit_msi || !entry->msg.address_hi)
> > >                        continue;
> > > -             pci_err(dev, "Device has broken 64-bit MSI but arch"
> > > -                     " tried to assign one above 4G\n");
> > > +             pci_err(dev, "Device has either broken 64-bit MSI or "
> > > +                     "only 32-bit MSI support but "
> > > +                     "arch tried to assign one above 4G\n");
> > >                return -EIO;
> > >        }
> > >        return 0;
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > > 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] PCI/MSI: Set device flag indicating only 32-bit MSI support
  2020-12-03 19:54       ` Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2020-12-04  2:28         ` Vidya Sagar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Vidya Sagar @ 2020-12-04  2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas
  Cc: bhelgaas, lorenzo.pieralisi, thierry.reding, jonathanh,
	linux-pci, linux-kernel, kthota, mmaddireddy, sagar.tv



On 12/4/2020 1:24 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:33:45AM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>> On 12/3/2020 11:54 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 04:20:35PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>>>> There are devices (Ex:- Marvell SATA controller) that don't support
>>>> 64-bit MSIs and the same is advertised through their MSI capability
>>>> register. Set no_64bit_msi flag explicitly for such devices in the
>>>> MSI setup code so that the msi_verify_entries() API would catch
>>>> if the MSI arch code tries to use 64-bit MSI.
>>>
>>> This seems good to me.  I'll post a possible revision to set
>>> dev->no_64bit_msi in the device enumeration path instead of in the IRQ
>>> allocation path, since it's really a property of the device, not of
>>> the msi_desc.
>>>
>>> I like the extra checking this gives us.  Was this prompted by
>>> tripping over something, or is it something you noticed by code
>>> reading?  If the former, a hint about what was wrong and how it's
>>> being fixed would be useful.
>> I observed functionality issue with Marvell SATA controller (1b4b:9171) when
>> the allocated MSI target address was a 64-bit address. I mentioned the
>> Marvell SATA controller as an example in the commit message.
> 
> I know you mentioned the Marvell controller, but apparently that
> device is working perfectly correctly: it does not support 64-bit MSI,
> and it does not advertise support for 64-bit MSI.
> 
> So if there's a functionality issue, that means something is wrong in
> Linux that caused us to assign a 64-bit MSI address to it.  *That*
> issue is what I want to know about.  Your patch only warns about the
> issue; it doesn't fix it.
The issue is in the DWC code. I pushed a generic patch to fix that issue 
by specifying the limit of MSI target address to 32-bit region. Patch is 
up for review at 
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20201117165312.25847-1-vidyas@nvidia.com/

> 
> I don't think there's any point in specifically mentioning the Marvell
> device if it is working correctly, because the same issue should
> affect *any* device that doesn't support 64-bit MSI.  But if there's
> some arch code that incorrectly assigns a 64-bit address, it would
> definitely be useful to specify the arch.  And hopefully there's a fix
> for that arch code, too.
> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> V2:
>>>> * Addressed Bjorn's comment and changed the error message
>>>>
>>>>    drivers/pci/msi.c | 11 +++++++----
>>>>    1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
>>>> index d52d118979a6..8de5ba6b4a59 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
>>>> @@ -581,10 +581,12 @@ msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd)
>>>>         entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap     = (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK) >> 1;
>>>>         entry->msi_attrib.multiple      = ilog2(__roundup_pow_of_two(nvec));
>>>>
>>>> -     if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT)
>>>> +     if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) {
>>>>                 entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64;
>>>> -     else
>>>> +     } else {
>>>>                 entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32;
>>>> +             dev->no_64bit_msi = 1;
>>>> +     }
>>>>
>>>>         /* Save the initial mask status */
>>>>         if (entry->msi_attrib.maskbit)
>>>> @@ -602,8 +604,9 @@ static int msi_verify_entries(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>>         for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev) {
>>>>                 if (!dev->no_64bit_msi || !entry->msg.address_hi)
>>>>                         continue;
>>>> -             pci_err(dev, "Device has broken 64-bit MSI but arch"
>>>> -                     " tried to assign one above 4G\n");
>>>> +             pci_err(dev, "Device has either broken 64-bit MSI or "
>>>> +                     "only 32-bit MSI support but "
>>>> +                     "arch tried to assign one above 4G\n");
>>>>                 return -EIO;
>>>>         }
>>>>         return 0;
>>>> --
>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-04  2:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-17 14:57 [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Set device flag indicating only 32-bit MSI support Vidya Sagar
2020-11-20 21:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-24  3:57   ` Vidya Sagar
2020-11-24 10:50 ` [PATCH V2] " Vidya Sagar
2020-12-03  5:00   ` Vidya Sagar
2020-12-03 18:24   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-12-03 19:03     ` Vidya Sagar
2020-12-03 19:54       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-12-04  2:28         ` Vidya Sagar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).