linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, tom@herbertland.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 3/3] tun: add eBPF based queue selection method
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 21:02:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43c86606-2911-768d-704f-8b25e04cb47b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171031184002-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>



On 2017年11月01日 00:45, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> +static void __tun_set_steering_ebpf(struct tun_struct *tun,
>> +				    struct bpf_prog *new)
>> +{
>> +	struct bpf_prog *old;
>> +
>> +	old = rtnl_dereference(tun->steering_prog);
>> +	rcu_assign_pointer(tun->steering_prog, new);
>> +
>> +	if (old) {
>> +		synchronize_net();
>> +		bpf_prog_destroy(old);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
> Is this really called under rtnl?

Yes it is __tun_chr_ioctl() will call rtnl_lock().

> If no then rtnl_dereference
> is wrong. If yes I'm not sure you can call synchronize_net
> under rtnl.
>

Are you worrying about the long wait? Looking at synchronize_net(), it does:

void synchronize_net(void)
{
     might_sleep();
     if (rtnl_is_locked())
         synchronize_rcu_expedited();
     else
         synchronize_rcu();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_net);

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-01 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-31 10:32 [PATCH net-next V2 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap Jason Wang
2017-10-31 10:32 ` [PATCH net-next V2 1/3] tun: abstract flow steering logic Jason Wang
2017-11-02  1:11   ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-11-02  3:43     ` Jason Wang
2017-11-02  3:45       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-11-02  3:51         ` Jason Wang
2017-11-03  8:49           ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-10-31 10:32 ` [PATCH net-next V2 2/3] tun: introduce ioctls to set and get steering policies Jason Wang
2017-11-02  1:15   ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-10-31 10:32 ` [PATCH net-next V2 3/3] tun: add eBPF based queue selection method Jason Wang
2017-10-31 16:45   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-11-01 13:02     ` Jason Wang [this message]
2017-11-01 13:59       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-11-01 19:12         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-11-02  3:24           ` Jason Wang
2017-11-02  3:45         ` Jason Wang
2017-11-03  8:56   ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-11-03 23:56     ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-11-08  5:28       ` Jason Wang
2017-11-08  5:43         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-11-08 11:13           ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43c86606-2911-768d-704f-8b25e04cb47b@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom@herbertland.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).