linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Victor Porton <porton@ex-code.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@argo.co.il>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New reliability technique
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:30:36 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44019F6C.4020400@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f020602260425p70fc4c5cn6de8dd6aa8a876d7@mail.gmail.com>

Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 2/26/06, Victor Porton <porton@ex-code.com> wrote:
> 
>>Isn't it better to double check (especially after such risky things as
>>e.g. software suspend)?
>>
>>We need to check not only for damaged hardware, but also for
>>kernel/modules bugs. For this ECC and cache reliability is useless.
> 
> 
> What kernel bugs do you want to catch with double-checking free
> memory? For use-after-free, we already have slab poisoning.
> 

And for !slab, we unmap kernel virtual addresses with page debugging,
which seems like a better solution.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

      reply	other threads:[~2006-02-26 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-25 13:21 New reliability technique Victor Porton
2006-02-25 13:26 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-25 13:27   ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-25 19:52     ` Avi Kivity
2006-02-25 19:56       ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-25 22:44         ` Janos Farkas
2006-02-26 11:34       ` Victor Porton
2006-02-26 12:25         ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-26 12:30           ` Nick Piggin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44019F6C.4020400@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=avi@argo.co.il \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=porton@ex-code.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).