From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BCDC433EF for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 02:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1348923AbiALCqn (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 21:46:43 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:44034 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345477AbiALCqm (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 21:46:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1641955595; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lrg/rvcseomradiaHHuYHA2x3dDDuMaVcEYJB9dgKGE=; b=HFbEvTNrTK17JvVDwN+l6k0o6XH0ej/rzt5wZNCqffcjKdmFxV8fO2JLHRkhUHrq2IMlNh SpfUj3SqVzeTis0Ao+7KuvTPU37o8eCV/J/SytXRk77p7qdPNfwevIIqLynd/qW2hEyohj 8b5ixfpvoHEa4CIq4s0WplpvcY8y3iI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-231-QaXQ-xsCMZixjJs-4ANMPQ-1; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 21:46:32 -0500 X-MC-Unique: QaXQ-xsCMZixjJs-4ANMPQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEB801898292; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 02:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.72.12.29] (ovpn-12-29.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.29]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ACED5BE29; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 02:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Reply-To: Gavin Shan Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/21] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_EVENT_GET_INFO hypercall To: Eric Auger , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Cc: maz@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, will@kernel.org References: <20210815001352.81927-1-gshan@redhat.com> <20210815001352.81927-10-gshan@redhat.com> <03e9b1fb-af79-69bf-f242-00fef3b11a81@redhat.com> From: Gavin Shan Message-ID: <44039a09-344f-3ac9-0d58-c0c8c4562b60@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 10:46:23 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <03e9b1fb-af79-69bf-f242-00fef3b11a81@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Eric, On 11/10/21 1:19 AM, Eric Auger wrote: > On 8/15/21 2:13 AM, Gavin Shan wrote: >> This supports SDEI_EVENT_GET_INFO hypercall. It's used by the guest >> to retrieve various information about the supported (exported) events, >> including type, signaled, route mode and affinity for the shared >> events. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan >> --- >> arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c >> index b95b8c4455e1..5dfa74b093f1 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c >> @@ -415,6 +415,80 @@ static unsigned long kvm_sdei_hypercall_status(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> return ret; >> } >> >> +static unsigned long kvm_sdei_hypercall_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> +{ >> + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; >> + struct kvm_sdei_kvm *ksdei = kvm->arch.sdei; >> + struct kvm_sdei_vcpu *vsdei = vcpu->arch.sdei; >> + struct kvm_sdei_event *kse = NULL; >> + struct kvm_sdei_kvm_event *kske = NULL; >> + unsigned long event_num = smccc_get_arg1(vcpu); >> + unsigned long event_info = smccc_get_arg2(vcpu); >> + unsigned long ret = SDEI_SUCCESS; >> + >> + /* Sanity check */ >> + if (!(ksdei && vsdei)) { >> + ret = SDEI_NOT_SUPPORTED; >> + goto out; >> + } >> + >> + if (!kvm_sdei_is_valid_event_num(event_num)) { >> + ret = SDEI_INVALID_PARAMETERS; >> + goto out; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * Check if the KVM event exists. The event might have been >> + * registered, we need fetch the information from the registered > s/fetch/to fetch Ack. >> + * event in that case. >> + */ >> + spin_lock(&ksdei->lock); >> + kske = kvm_sdei_find_kvm_event(kvm, event_num); >> + kse = kske ? kske->kse : NULL; >> + if (!kse) { >> + kse = kvm_sdei_find_event(kvm, event_num); >> + if (!kse) { >> + ret = SDEI_INVALID_PARAMETERS; > this should have already be covered by !kvm_sdei_is_valid_event_num I > think (although this latter only checks the since static event num with > KVM owner mask) Nope. Strictly speaking, kvm_sdei_find_event() covers the check carried by !kvm_sdei_is_valid_event_num(). All the defined (exposed) events should have virtual event number :) >> + goto unlock; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + /* Retrieve the requested information */ >> + switch (event_info) { >> + case SDEI_EVENT_INFO_EV_TYPE: >> + ret = kse->state.type; >> + break; >> + case SDEI_EVENT_INFO_EV_SIGNALED: >> + ret = kse->state.signaled; >> + break; >> + case SDEI_EVENT_INFO_EV_PRIORITY: >> + ret = kse->state.priority; >> + break; >> + case SDEI_EVENT_INFO_EV_ROUTING_MODE: >> + case SDEI_EVENT_INFO_EV_ROUTING_AFF: >> + if (kse->state.type != SDEI_EVENT_TYPE_SHARED) { >> + ret = SDEI_INVALID_PARAMETERS; >> + break; >> + } >> + >> + if (event_info == SDEI_EVENT_INFO_EV_ROUTING_MODE) { >> + ret = kske ? kske->state.route_mode : >> + SDEI_EVENT_REGISTER_RM_ANY; > no, if event is not registered (!kske) DENIED should be returned I don't think so. According to the specification, there is no DENIED return value for STATUS hypercall. Either INVALID_PARAMETERS or NOT_SUPPORTED should be returned from this hypercall :) >> + } else { > same here >> + ret = kske ? kske->state.route_affinity : 0; >> + } >> + >> + break; >> + default: >> + ret = SDEI_INVALID_PARAMETERS; >> + } >> + >> +unlock: >> + spin_unlock(&ksdei->lock); >> +out: >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> int kvm_sdei_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> { >> u32 func = smccc_get_function(vcpu); >> @@ -446,6 +520,8 @@ int kvm_sdei_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> ret = kvm_sdei_hypercall_status(vcpu); >> break; >> case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_EVENT_GET_INFO: >> + ret = kvm_sdei_hypercall_info(vcpu); >> + break; >> case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_EVENT_ROUTING_SET: >> case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_PE_MASK: >> case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_PE_UNMASK: >> Thanks, Gavin